just as you for example think its reasonable to violate the freedom of inmates i believe

So freedom is not your goal at all.

Radical egalitarianism is

Not really, i think the market is pretty good at allocating resources

it has some inherent inequality tied to it

so yeah not really radical egalitarianism

You'd think the market would be good at selecting against racism as well

It's not tho

How do you know?

It's always been law for the past half century

Because comunities of racist exist that can support each other

Okay? Is that your community?

>It's always been law for the past half century
If a law was needed is it because the market was failing?

Should we eliminate the Japanese now? They're pretty racist.

My community? I've no sense of nationalism

Nationalism only creates problems and clonflics

breaking the borders brings freedom to all

No, actually, the Civil rights act was imposed even thought the market wanted to integrate blacks in the US

so it's a desirable goal

But I want borders. That's my freedom of association

Sounds like you don't like freedom

Well if your freedom inters with other's then it's time for you to stop 😃

Why?

Because you're violating other people's freedom

Their freedom of movement is interfering with my right to a quiet neighborhood

and we don't want that if we want to maximize freedom do we?

So let me get it right, two people want to associate with each others but you don't want them in "your" neighbourhood

How can my freedom interfere with someone else's freedom? That doesn't even make sense

@StevenStevens Yes, so what are the rules of the neighborhood?

If two people in El paso want to associate what right does someone that isn't even there have to tell them not to?

No one is telling you to open your house for them

The local laws of El paso are

altough the abolition of land lords is also desirable

Is it desirable?

That's a big assumption

It is for the citizens of a nation to decide border policy, thats what makes nations sovereign. No one else has the "right" to cross the border into to associate with someone else in the same way person A can't trespass on person B's property to associate with someone else if person B isn't consenting

This doesn't sound like freedom at all.

Sounds like some bastardized definition of freedom

Hell, freedom itself is a dumb word

Yes, people worrying about where to sleep and eat makes them less free, it's a loaded gun pushing them into actions they would otherwise not take

Define freedom

Living in a commune with my communist friends

That doesn't answer anything