Message from @Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸
Discord ID: 608700312579997696
And I'm guessing his past is shady as fuck
despite only making up 13% of the population and responsible for 51% of mass shootings <:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>
Oh fuck the britisher.
Damn fence sitting nanny
<:kek:590371888480387073>
He's the voice of reason
BEEP BEEP
Law Enforcement coming through
quite refreshing to see a British police car without a rainbow flag on it
just like the old days
Cummings is God Mode
but he's not my God
This is Savage
For the euros
constitutional duty or contractual duty?
afaik the federal constitution doesn't really deal with policing so it would be unusual to find such a duty there
Not sure how to word the line between the two, but the end result is that police are officially a reactionary force designated to catch criminals, not protect your individual person during a criminal event
^ This
The constitutional duty of protection falls upon the individual
for me it would depend on the legislation establishing the police force in question and the particular contract the officer signed etc.
@Fitzydog see it sounds like the state in question made some legislation making it mandatory for police to arrest someone who is violating certain orders, and if the police in that state took the job then that is implicitly a duty they agreed to by becoming police
nothing to do with the federal constitution
or a duty to protect
Sure, I guess.
But good luck carrying out a lawsuit
Because, this is the supreme court saying that you have no ground
yes well the case in question is the woman trying to sue the town or city, not the city suing the officer