Message from @Broo TulsiGang 2024 ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Discord ID: 388707571256655882


2017-12-08 12:13:37 UTC  

"In total, 21.7 million comments were submitted electronically and posted online for review."

2017-12-08 12:13:46 UTC  

that's a metric fuck-ton of comments

2017-12-08 12:16:17 UTC  

"Of the 21.7 million comments posted, 6% were unique. The other 94% were submitted multiple times โ€“ in some cases, hundreds of thousands of times. In fact, the seven most-submitted comments (six of which argued against net neutrality regulations) comprise 38% of all the submissions over the four-month comment period."

2017-12-08 12:17:47 UTC  

so it was basically a clusterfuck of who knows?

2017-12-08 12:21:24 UTC  

"The most common โ€œnameโ€... in nearly 17,000 instances ... [was] โ€œNet Neutralityโ€"

2017-12-08 12:21:53 UTC  

"โ€œThe Internetโ€ also appeared as the name in almost 7,500 submissions. "

2017-12-08 12:22:46 UTC  

As a seperate name, "net neutrality" also had about 5,000 submissions.

2017-12-08 12:25:47 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/377519739380957184/388667477216854016/net_neutrality.png

I've been on the end of this. The campaigners were quoting 100ks of people had written in but we binned 90% of them cus they were cut paste

cut and paste ain't YOUR opinion

a whole load more were edited versions of a template they posted on facebook

didn't bin those but still....

2017-12-08 14:35:56 UTC  

So NN was full of shills?

2017-12-08 14:36:00 UTC  

Of course

2017-12-08 14:36:13 UTC  

What a shocker /s

2017-12-08 14:36:52 UTC  

This is why theyโ€™ll never get anything achieved

2017-12-08 14:38:06 UTC  

It can just be flagged as a bot shitting out spam and the lazy congressmen can just ignore what ever emails were unique

2017-12-08 15:02:13 UTC  

you know.

2017-12-08 15:02:36 UTC  

I was reading something unrelated to NN, yet it summed up why... or at least one of the reasons why, I am so skeptical of it

2017-12-08 15:02:57 UTC  

Many people seem to point to Australia as having a great healthcare system because of the mix between private and public

Just like the UK ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿฟ

2017-12-08 15:06:07 UTC  

thus assuming it has a good balance between 'the big three' (that you supposedly can only have two of), being affordability, quality and accessibility

2017-12-08 15:06:15 UTC  

howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrr

2017-12-08 15:06:20 UTC  

what they don't tell you

2017-12-08 15:06:44 UTC  

Is that the government has bulldozed it's way into private health insurers and how they can provide them to their own customers

2017-12-08 15:08:13 UTC  

Let me find the relevant page on the Gov's DOH website

2017-12-08 15:08:53 UTC  

a'ight.

2017-12-08 15:09:01 UTC  

"Lifetime Health Cover is a Government initiative which was introduced on 1 July 2000, and designed to encourage people to take out hospital insurance earlier in life, and to maintain their cover over their lifetime."

2017-12-08 15:09:15 UTC  

sounds good, right? Get people off of public healthcare and into the private sector, save taxpayer dollars

2017-12-08 15:10:18 UTC  

"What is Lifetime Health Cover?
Lifetime Health Cover (LHC) is a financial loading that can be payable in addition to the base rate premium for your private health insurance hospital cover."

2017-12-08 15:10:42 UTC  

But how does it compel people to get private health?

2017-12-08 15:11:17 UTC  

"How do I avoid paying an **LHC loading**?
To avoid paying a LHC loading, you need to purchase hospital cover by 1 July **following your 31st birthday**. If you purchase hospital cover **after** this date you may be required to **pay a LHC loading** โ€“ **2% for each year you are over 30**. The loading is **removed after 10 years** of continuous hospital insurance cover."

2017-12-08 15:12:15 UTC  

wait, *what*?

2017-12-08 15:12:52 UTC  

"For instance, if you **wait until you are 40**, you could be paying an **extra 20% on the cost of your hospital cover**. If you wait until you are **50**, you could pay **40% more**. And so on, up to a maximum of 70% more."

2017-12-08 15:13:08 UTC  

This is for the **next ten years**, btw

2017-12-08 15:13:21 UTC  

but what does this have to do with NN?

2017-12-08 15:14:05 UTC  

"In Australia, **private health insurance is not โ€˜risk-ratedโ€™ like most forms of insurance**. Private health insurers **cannot refuse to insure any person**, and **must charge everyone the same premium for the same level of cover**, despite their risk profile and **likelihood of using health services.**"

2017-12-08 15:14:10 UTC  

Look after yourself?

2017-12-08 15:14:15 UTC  

Eat healthy?

2017-12-08 15:14:18 UTC  

Sleep well?

2017-12-08 15:14:22 UTC  

Don't smoke?