Message from @Broo TulsiGang 2024 π¬π§ πΊπΈ
Discord ID: 392454789931335680
I think cerovich did a stream on it
Mike Cernovich tweeted, got called out by /pol/ for not giving them credit.
I think this has something to do with antifa rebranding as weather underground?
damnit was that their website?
it's one of them at least, but I don't think the article was on that one
yea i should have opened that in archive
"It was Amtrak's first passenger service to run on a new, shorter route."
<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>
Hmmmm makes you wonder
Some luck if you were an Antifa targeting frieght trains
@Broo TulsiGang 2024 π¬π§ πΊπΈ imagine if their new iPhone was on of those trains
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I'm sure they all have Fairphone's Comrade
lol
kinda just looks like it was going too fast <:think_literalpepe:378717098630971397>
huh
interesting
Front is still on same alignment as the rear. I can't see someone putting something on the track exactly at that bend
yeah
The train was definitely going too fast
I'm also not sure that the bridge would have been good anyway, that angle of attack was just begging for an accident to happen, and happen it did
so accident instead of terrorism plot?
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
MUH INTERNET GONE
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
All they've proved is that they don't deserve any ability to use the internet
fucking dickless children
I'd say the opposite, I'd say it proves that the people they doxxed dont deserve the ability to use the internet :P
which is not the same as saying I agree with them doing it, or the politics of it
any why is that?
well I don't actually think that, but I think that more than what you said, if it's a scale with doxxing on both ends
what you said implies that the understanding of and ability to use a technology should be arbitrarily decided by some random person
while what I said implies that the user understand what the hell they're doing when they use the internet
a bunch of words for a bunch of air
yes, mostly because english is not my first language so I could not think of the terms that I should be using
but essentially what you said is that "there are rules on the internet, and we don't like it when people are doxxed, so these people should have their internet license revoked"
but who determines the rules?
what I said is "the people who got doxxed should've known better, they've clearly put their information in an unsecure location"
No
you interpreted that
yes, that's why I used the word "essentially"
and "what you said implies"