Message from @Broo TulsiGang 2024 πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Discord ID: 392453187468263425


2017-12-18 22:47:03 UTC  

We only know that antifa advocated for derailing trains with concrete, and that they just deleted the article.

2017-12-18 22:47:35 UTC  

seriously?

2017-12-18 22:47:48 UTC  

i only posted that because it was on /pol/

2017-12-18 22:48:04 UTC  

It's going around Twitter too.

2017-12-18 22:48:35 UTC  

I think cerovich did a stream on it

2017-12-18 22:48:56 UTC  

Mike Cernovich tweeted, got called out by /pol/ for not giving them credit.

2017-12-18 22:48:59 UTC  

I think this has something to do with antifa rebranding as weather underground?

2017-12-18 22:51:20 UTC  

damnit was that their website?

2017-12-18 22:51:35 UTC  

it's one of them at least, but I don't think the article was on that one

2017-12-18 22:53:03 UTC  

yea i should have opened that in archive

"It was Amtrak's first passenger service to run on a new, shorter route."

<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

2017-12-18 22:59:31 UTC  

Hmmmm makes you wonder

Some luck if you were an Antifa targeting frieght trains

2017-12-18 23:01:13 UTC  

@Broo TulsiGang 2024 πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ imagine if their new iPhone was on of those trains

2017-12-18 23:01:26 UTC  

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I'm sure they all have Fairphone's Comrade

2017-12-18 23:05:30 UTC  

lol

kinda just looks like it was going too fast <:think_literalpepe:378717098630971397>

2017-12-18 23:12:32 UTC  

huh

2017-12-18 23:12:38 UTC  

interesting

Front is still on same alignment as the rear. I can't see someone putting something on the track exactly at that bend

2017-12-18 23:16:22 UTC  

yeah

2017-12-18 23:17:28 UTC  

The train was definitely going too fast
I'm also not sure that the bridge would have been good anyway, that angle of attack was just begging for an accident to happen, and happen it did

2017-12-18 23:20:23 UTC  

so accident instead of terrorism plot?

2017-12-18 23:26:21 UTC  

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
MUH INTERNET GONE
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
All they've proved is that they don't deserve any ability to use the internet

2017-12-18 23:26:38 UTC  

fucking dickless children

2017-12-18 23:27:37 UTC  

I'd say the opposite, I'd say it proves that the people they doxxed dont deserve the ability to use the internet :P

2017-12-18 23:27:55 UTC  

which is not the same as saying I agree with them doing it, or the politics of it

2017-12-18 23:31:59 UTC  

any why is that?

2017-12-18 23:33:45 UTC  

well I don't actually think that, but I think that more than what you said, if it's a scale with doxxing on both ends

2017-12-18 23:34:57 UTC  

what you said implies that the understanding of and ability to use a technology should be arbitrarily decided by some random person

2017-12-18 23:35:18 UTC  

while what I said implies that the user understand what the hell they're doing when they use the internet

2017-12-18 23:36:45 UTC  

a bunch of words for a bunch of air

2017-12-18 23:42:19 UTC  

yes, mostly because english is not my first language so I could not think of the terms that I should be using

2017-12-18 23:42:57 UTC  

but essentially what you said is that "there are rules on the internet, and we don't like it when people are doxxed, so these people should have their internet license revoked"

2017-12-18 23:43:07 UTC  

but who determines the rules?

2017-12-18 23:43:32 UTC  

what I said is "the people who got doxxed should've known better, they've clearly put their information in an unsecure location"