Message from @folk
Discord ID: 396313747628490753
childless people shouldn't be teachers
the dry cunt, grey haired feminist shouldn't be teaching kids
I actually agree that childless women should not be teachers, but I don't think the same applies to childless men
at the same time though, isn't that the same argument an SJW uses
like mittens, he asked me "where are you from", during an argument, and it's like - how does it matter?
how does it matter what skin color I am or my sexual orientation to an intellectual argument?
so does it matter if a woman is childless?
I don't know - like I said, I agree with you, but I'm not sure if I can defend that position adequately
It doesn't
BUT
in Females we say they Project
in Males we say they are Pedos
end of day
although they are childless
they might care for the kids more than thier own parents
```"We shall go on to the end. We shall fight at Berkeley, we shall fight in the classroom and in the dorms, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the hallways, we shall defend our freedom, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight in the Womans Studies, we shall fight in the Gender Studies, we shall fight in the Sexuality and Marxist studies, we shall fight in the Humanities; we shall never surrender, and if, which I do not for a moment believe, this freedom or a large part of it were suppressed and ridiculed, then our Speech beyond the seas, REEEEE'ing and declaring, guarded by the Sargon, would carry on the struggle, until, in the God-Emperor's good time, the Free World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the Kekistani people."```
Why does Mittens care where you are from? I don't
well apparently because it's relevant to an intellectual discussion, all SJWs think that
oh
but it's obviously ludicrous - any argument that can't stand on its own merit is not an argument
BUT
YOUR LIVED EXPERIENCES
lol
which we shall disregard if you're a white cis male anyway
because society is STILL stacked in your favour
WRONG
christ this fucking thread in /r/latestagecapitalism
https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/7mp1ks/unless_theres_another_terror_incident_in_the_usa/
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Reeeeeeeeeee
wot
I'd love to see what parameters they used to qualify certain events as 'terrorist attacks' and which ones to discard
^this
They also only start counting after... which date again?
also, even if that statement is correct to any degree, what point does it prove or make?