video in swedish https://youtu.be/3d0Qw6zGgmo

Camo hijabs, wtf

*t a c t i c a l i s l a m*

pathetic pandering to shitty religion, sweden yes!

SO PROGRESSIVE

these days, as a dane, you really feel vindicated in your hatred of sweden.

used to only flare up from the brotherly rivalry once in a blue moon

but now it's pretty much constant

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-42720646

[11:51 AM] folk: amagad my feed is drowning in feminist propaganda

that's one of them

http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20180115-why-a-side-gig-can-be-harder-for-women

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/01/22/the-women-who-took-on-the-mafia

that's two others

brave.

`She says three main challenges hold them back: time, money and confidence. “I think if we can conquer those we’ll be starting more businesses.”`

I mean

I'm not sure what male founders would say are their three main challenges

I'm sure they wouldn't even think to mention those three things, actually, because they're so banal

they're not "challenges", they're just the basics that need to be in place

if I had an idea for something other than a basic import business, I probably wouldn't share it

but yeah, time money and confidence are necessary regardless of the junk between your legs...

my point was that if you walk up to a male founder after they've got the business started, and ask them "what were the 3 main challenges in getting the business started", they wouldn't even think about those 3 things

gotta keep the dialogue running, and the perceived injustices towards women vague, so feminism can keep justifying its pervasiveness

yes, hence why I said "amagad my feed is drowning in feminist propaganda", and the reason I didn't link any of them until someone else started it :P

useless drivel

well, I agree with you, I doubt anyone would even think to mention something so obvious

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42723401

"Up to 700 migrants are in the area, despite the camp known as the "Jungle" having been dismantled in 2016."

I wonder how much of those 44 million are going towards calais, specifically

then I could divide it by 700 and reeeeeeee

I mean, 700, that's not as many as you'd think - how about just getting them the fuck to africa

Ask the French, we are holding our moat

err, no

"It will be spent on fencing, CCTV and infrared detection technology in Calais and other border points."

It's for the Lorries

They need the protection

yes because the migrants are _there_

I'm not sure if you're still arguing the same point or just spewing information

your government is sending your money to calais

for 700 migrants, who for some reason are allowed to stay there, and not shipped to africa