Message from @Ϻ14ᛟ
Discord ID: 427899931181842432
We don't have a problem with it being as you call it a 'priviledge' though
This is a cultural difference front to back
We push for more or less priviledges as a democracy
the only way to guarantee your liberty is by having an insurance plan in the form of an armed people. How do you oppress people with rifles? You kick one door down and get riddled with gunfire.
Under the framework of what the basic law grants us
This is why the US is uninvadeable.
and despite the government allowing us certain things
the basic law is still inalienable
We are literally immune to foreign takeover
Having or not having arms mean shit.
Armed people can be alienated
No, geography is why
if it is disrespected by politicans, they get thrown out
This idea that "we have guns, so we are free" it's ridiculous
even if you had direct land border and no US military, you would have to outnumber us.
we have guns so we are free = we are free so long as there's not a bigger force of opinion to gun us down
@Fulcrum010 thats a simplistic take.
Your government spy the living shit out of every single human being on earth
@radeon
Because your take is simplistic
we have guns ***because*** we are free.
it is the means by which we ensure that freedom
>287 new messages
we ensure our freedom with our demoractic right to protest and to vote for whoever represents us best or to campaign if we don't think the person in charge is doing a good job
"we have guns, so we are free, anyone else that don't have guns live in a dictatorship" for fuck sake
What sort of fucking autism came through here?
ok, so what do you do when your parliment votes to stop all elections and repeal the constitution?
or simply ignore your rights?
your rights are words on paper, they mean nothing without enforcement.
@radeon get fucked is the answer to that, my dude
The idea that a lack of guns is dictatorship is dumb
You revolt.
The legal acess to weapon means shit during a revolution
If people want to revolt againt their government they do
With guns or no guns
a lack of guns is absolutely neccesary for dictatorship, yes
Especially since the government has really big guns
before this inevitably turns into the US gun owners vs. the military argument, let me nip that in the bud by saying that isn't what we're talking about
if they violate our basic law
to such a massive extent
goddamn
without a democratic mandate
people will find their weapons