Message from @McNukes
Discord ID: 427941593832620032
This was in like 1830 mind you
This law actually makes a lot of sense
Some more forbidden history: one third of free blacks pre-civil war owned slaves.
You can't trust a former slave
"around blacks never relax" Baraban š
"see a nigger pull the trigger" baraban
Isn't one third more than more than the national average?
"one man klan" baraban
I mean I would expect most of them to be poor
Yea not like the second amendment predates widespread slavery by nearly a century.
Slavery was actually not that prevalent until cotton
There were more slaves in Portugal than the 13 colonies
What i meant was how could one third of the free black men population could afford slaves?
Most Whites weren't rich enough
Because not all of them were poor
the hell is going on?
But a third were rich?
There was a very high degree of wealth disparity
<@&372567061840527383>
http://www.liberalists.uk/map/
that's a neat map
What did they ask them?
Man
I doubt anyone in the UK would outright say he's anti free speach
The city just beyond mine is anti-free speech
Sad.
Cool.
cooo
We need more liberalists.
>labour
>anti-free spech
well imagine my shock
>labour
>doing anything usefull
Nobody is surprised tbh.
If the Labour Party ever takes over, Iād suggest that the English should revolt.
>labour
Fuck Newport.
Also it is colour not color
Honestly when they are jailing people for jokes you kinda have to consider revolting
Or labor
Oh no
My MP is labour