Message from @Baraban
Discord ID: 427934935735599104
That is the literal opposite of the truth
Federal regulations didn't stop the klan riders, armed black men did.
Wasnt gun control originally inplemented as measure to stop blacks from owning guns?
The first election after the civil war ended there were attacks on blacks to try and intimidate them out of voting, armed black men guarded the polls.
Yes it was
The first federal-level gun control act, among other things, banned freed slaves from owning guns
This was in like 1830 mind you
This law actually makes a lot of sense
Some more forbidden history: one third of free blacks pre-civil war owned slaves.
You can't trust a former slave
"around blacks never relax" Baraban š
"see a nigger pull the trigger" baraban
Isn't one third more than more than the national average?
"one man klan" baraban
I mean I would expect most of them to be poor
Yea not like the second amendment predates widespread slavery by nearly a century.
Slavery was actually not that prevalent until cotton
There were more slaves in Portugal than the 13 colonies
What i meant was how could one third of the free black men population could afford slaves?
Because not all of them were poor
the hell is going on?
But a third were rich?
There was a very high degree of wealth disparity
<@&372567061840527383>
http://www.liberalists.uk/map/
So far the Labor MPs are Anti-Free Speech. Imagine my fucking shock
that's a neat map
What did they ask them?
Man
I doubt anyone in the UK would outright say he's anti free speach
The city just beyond mine is anti-free speech
Sad.
Cool.
cooo
We need more liberalists.
>labour
>anti-free spech
well imagine my shock
>labour
>doing anything usefull
Nobody is surprised tbh.
If the Labour Party ever takes over, Iād suggest that the English should revolt.
>labour