Message from @ᚴᚬᚾᛁᚾᚴ ᚱᚢᚦᚴᚨᚱ (Hrothgar)
Discord ID: 430939984091152404
@Fulcrum010 I apologize
@Deleted User Who is not? It is instrumental to serve the state to validate its protection.
@Fulcrum010 I've talked to people who immediately laugh at the notion of 'natural rights' because it's premised upon the concept of 'higher power'.
It's ok
Is everyone british here
It may be premised in such but it is a humanist premise as well which I despite being an anti theist can thoroughly agree with.
No
@Deleted User I am an Indian.
Some of us have guns
No way virat kohli
@ᚴᚬᚾᛁᚾᚴ ᚱᚢᚦᚴᚨᚱ (Hrothgar) poo in loo?
Yep.
Sachin Tendulkar
Lol.
I am not much fan of cricket though.
>Indian
>has Germanic name
I am Pakistani and part pashtun
Wot
gtfo
lol
Likewise man
I am part English and part God
Death to the British colonial masters!
Lol
@Deleted User Whoa, hey now
Reverse partition!
what in the hell happened here?
Annex Canada!
@Deleted User it got messy
@Fitzydog Okay so you are arguing that without the police a government can function legally by protecting citizen rights in courts, right?
have yall been converted?
Remove paddy scum!
who said classical liberalism was communism?
@ᚴᚬᚾᛁᚾᚴ ᚱᚢᚦᚴᚨᚱ (Hrothgar) Yes, in that case it would be an arbitration between two parties based on violation of rights from one to the other
Well I would agree to an extent but how about a state militia in place of police intervenes?
@ᚴᚬᚾᛁᚾᚴ ᚱᚢᚦᚴᚨᚱ (Hrothgar) Police technically aren't necessary
They need not to be paid by the government.
That's my point
Hmm, but there may be some problem there. What shall regulate the state militia to observe the laws?
If not their paycheck.