@ᚴᚬᚾᛁᚾᚴ ᚱᚢᚦᚴᚨᚱ (Hrothgar) poo in loo?

Yep.

Sachin Tendulkar

Lol.

I am not much fan of cricket though.

>Indian
>has Germanic name

I am Pakistani and part pashtun

Wot

gtfo

lol

Ah nice to meet you

Likewise man

I am part English and part God

Death to the British colonial masters!

Lol

@Deleted User Whoa, hey now

Reverse partition!

what in the hell happened here?

Annex Canada!

@Deleted User it got messy

@Fitzydog Okay so you are arguing that without the police a government can function legally by protecting citizen rights in courts, right?

have yall been converted?

Remove paddy scum!

who said classical liberalism was communism?

@ᚴᚬᚾᛁᚾᚴ ᚱᚢᚦᚴᚨᚱ (Hrothgar) Yes, in that case it would be an arbitration between two parties based on violation of rights from one to the other

Well I would agree to an extent but how about a state militia in place of police intervenes?

@ᚴᚬᚾᛁᚾᚴ ᚱᚢᚦᚴᚨᚱ (Hrothgar) Police technically aren't necessary

They need not to be paid by the government.

That's my point

Hmm, but there may be some problem there. What shall regulate the state militia to observe the laws?

If not their paycheck.

Just lynch the undesirables my dude

If everyone's armed.....

lol In my state of Oregon, there's an entire county without a police force. Just the court

It may soon erupt in chaos over trivial issues without an institution of power

They've got a sheriff to drive a guy to court lol

That’s not strange

It can operate well with small governments, yes

It’s be strange if there was neither a police nor a sheriff

Sheriffs are elected officials though

so it's different