Message from @Baraban
Discord ID: 436149395918946324
but it's not what is meant
I don't know what that is
you are your own property, and things that are an extension of yourself for the benefit of your survival is also your property.
you dont know who John Locke is
?
that is natural
No
you're arguing about natural rights and you dont know who john locke is?
....
lol, what an argument
Rights make sense, I don't need to no who that guy is to defend property rights
you mean you can work things out for yourself?
shocking
I find it shocking that you dont know who he is, yes
I get "insperations" from some poeple but yeah
and you're talking about natural rights
he did not invent natural rights
he didnt
Like I said the concept just make sense
is he the gatekeeper?
But when we talk about property as a natural right, you're talking about the lockean natural rights
In order to leave in freedom and piece at the same time
Yeah I just got that from my head
that doesnt mean people cant think about these things on their own Owl
I highly doubt you've come up with this yourself. I'm certain somoene had said it and you've all just agreed
it's just a guy that thought these same things, and I'm sure he wasnt the first
lol
I know who he is
I'm just saying it's not exactly a hard concept
I don't think you can call yourself a classical liberal if you dont know who John Locke is
gatekeeper
Like I said I get a lot of concepts and information from other people, mostly on youtube. But I form my opinions on my own
Yes i thought it might be youtubers
anyway it doesnt matter
it doesnt mean capitalism
Well if you reject property rights it means anyone can just go to your car and take it
private property and free exchange of goods is a prominent characteristic of classical liberal thought
but not so much capitalism per say
take john stuart mill
one of the most influencial liberal thinkers