societies that produced exclusively for use didn't have money

define exchange

I wonder how Marx would feel about that.

and they were also not very efficient at their production

oh work is a form of exchange

durrhhhh

NO

Time > Money > Exchange

exchange would be if property changed owners

@Deleted User The Root is black Stormfront

in primitive societies property was mostly held in common

I just got a G- on that App

by property do you mean land

like when hunters killed an animal the meat was held in common and rationed out

but what were women doing?

Well I question that

while I was hunting?

gathering and raising children probably

I havent seen any evidence the say that is so but it would seem more plausible that it was shared amongst families, or those involved in the hunt or both

Which is why we are called Hunter Gathers

which could be everyone since they were small communities

REEEEEEEE

getting killed by a raiding party from a neighbouring tribe <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

well it might vary from tribe to tribe

here's an article about the topic https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/02/barter-society-myth/471051/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law

well related

ius naturale, lex naturalis

you cannot fight it

as much as you try you will fail

and if you try

skim read half og it and there's a lot of supposing

Millions will die

I would suppose tribal societies would be survival of the fittest

cus we've done it before

what are you rambling about broo

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Santayana

someone needs to read Leviathan

"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It."

what about it

exactly you haven't read it