Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 445837596023586836
none
none? why not
..............
Just......
No
because I think using violence and murder to try and impose your politcs on anyone is despicable
and evil
He is probably implying that the conventional national forces are terrorist groups
i am at least glad that you support assad's victory over the western backed terrorists
well no you just think it's evil when a state actor doesn't do it
No I don't
not u
Why are you even arguing with Based Knopfler? He's a simpleton
don't tell me what I think
>cetronius calling someone a simpleton
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-05-10/china-proves-marx-right-on-his-200th-birthday this article was suggested to me by my Firefox browser
well if you don't support any terrorist groups then surely you think the syrian government ought to win the civil war
though it depends on how you interpret "support"
I don't think there's a single party in the Syrian civil war that I want to see winning
and i'm not saying it's bad, i want the syrian government to win too
I'm generally on the side of the syrian govt winning, but neither side is particuarly good
Assad is the lesser of two evils
two?
Do you know anything about the conflict?
fine, multiple evils
There are more than two parties involved
well i would consider the syrian arab republic and the ba'athism that drives it to be a more or less positive force
You idiot
the phrase wasn't supposed to be taken literally
"lesser of two evils" simply means "one choice is better than the other"
Sure, herpa derp
also it would be better for the european people to support the syrian government over the rebels
Yeah, exactly
Based Knopfler supports the states and they don't support Assad
it wouldn't be for western capitalists, however
Fucking imbecile
I just don't tolerate fools
He clearly has no clue about the conflict