So you agree

@Deleted User are you aware of Occam's Razor?

Yes

I wasn't just correcting him for his sake, I knew he might be a troll

The result that requires the least amount of excuses is more likely to be true?
Which is more likely then.
This man is so retarded he believes Australia is upside down and black people can't swim, or

He's a troll

I was correcting him so other people don't believe him

Look some people online can be really really thick

You don't feed trolls, ever

youre telling us

Because then you become the joke

*o h t h e i r o n y*

I didn't feed him

I wasn't upset about him

...

He didn't incite any emotion from me

I was just coldly correcting the factual claims he made

You fed the troll by responding to him...

I need to go walk my dog now

That's how you feed a troll
Doesn't require any emotions

Just responses

I'll see you later Mark Knopfler

Thanks for the conversation

be good 2 doggo

The easiest way to get responses is by emotions, yes, or by getting the attention of a certain type of righteous person who must correct the oh so stupid *troll*

They fish for responses
If you give them responses, you feed them

Not a tough concept to grasp

ouch

Why does it matter though

The only thing Israel deserves is a nuclear holocaust
Long live Hamas

the feefees will not survive here

Who the fuck cares if that guy enjoyed my reaction

As long as other people know that he's full of shit

*w a l k y o u r d o g*

I just had to say that

now I'm going

*other people can tell he's full of shit*