Anyway I'm not sure if social benefits are a good thing but I'm not appoused to it on pricple

Good that you changed into a free/social market mix

The only fair is laissez faire

^

Laissez faire is fucking evil

how can it be evil?

Ricardo invented laissez faire and said don't do it

Health care for example is something I would like citizens to have, but I think private health care will likely be more eefective

@Baraban hence why a social market has both ^^

how is it evil though?

Well I am a social capitalist

Well but you are wasting tax money creating public health care

At it's core laissez faire has no consumer protection, no anti-cartell laws, no nothing

Hence why we invented the free-market to keep the capitalists in check

voluntary transactions of good and services without third party interference can't be evil

people can be evil

And public health care usually isn't as effective as private health care when comes to profit per money spent

https://radicalcentrism.org/2016/11/03/in-search-of-social-capitalism/

i don't think the uk was ever socialist

Imagine my shock when the roach is for collectives

it was just a social democracy in the 70's

it had a smaller public sector than norway does now

And to make it harder for people to be eveil we have the free market <:what:382980756139409409>

How does it not have consumer protection agency's?

@Deleted User because consumer protection is an invention of the free market?

You can't have capitalism without government

https://youtu.be/2cqJEDd8N74?t=90

watch this

Weird coming from you

Tahtcher was fucking cancer she impoverished millions

obviously didnt watch

http://governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=13 here's a list of reasons why

@Deleted User You can't have a society without a government

The only really good thing she did was reduce the power of the unions

And she way overdid that

^

What we don't want is bureaucracy

She impoverished the lower class

Privatized profitable state industries

unions are bad

Abolished millions of jobs