Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 453142519891492874


2018-06-04 09:06:28 UTC  

And the vast majority of people will agree that sexually taking advantage of someone is shitty behaviour

2018-06-04 10:13:48 UTC  

sargons basically a crypto-yid

2018-06-04 10:17:02 UTC  

Sargon's a shill <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

2018-06-04 10:18:29 UTC  

@Hyddraigon "consent".

Also, "taking advantage" is insanely subjective

2018-06-04 10:20:25 UTC  

consent is actually pretty objective, imagine any ordinary transaction or contract where both party agree to it

2018-06-04 10:20:56 UTC  

Sorry, the "consent" bit was me being a spelling nazi

2018-06-04 10:21:30 UTC  

Edited

2018-06-04 10:23:38 UTC  

It's objective, the problem is it's rarely put on paper and there aren't usually witnesses because wtf

2018-06-04 10:23:44 UTC  

so it's a little hard to prove

2018-06-04 10:23:51 UTC  

I wonder if that'll change in the future

2018-06-04 10:24:03 UTC  

signed contracts acknowledging consent

2018-06-04 10:24:36 UTC  

on one side it sounds like an absolute moodkiller

2018-06-04 10:24:38 UTC  

Even actual business and contracts can get messy with grey zones around what exactly was agreed to

2018-06-04 10:24:38 UTC  

on another

2018-06-04 10:24:47 UTC  

it might become a de facto necessity

2018-06-04 10:24:55 UTC  

especially if you're in any way significant

2018-06-04 10:25:01 UTC  

look at #metoo inquisition

2018-06-04 10:25:23 UTC  

like I'm sure a lot of it is genuine since there's fucktons of weinstein style scum

2018-06-04 10:25:28 UTC  

the problem is how do you tell which ones

2018-06-04 10:26:23 UTC  

how about if woman think the sex they are going to have is regretful, maybe they shouldnt have sex with that person ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2018-06-04 10:26:35 UTC  

but apparently, thats me being hyper conservative

2018-06-04 10:26:46 UTC  

dude

2018-06-04 10:26:50 UTC  

Look at Stan Lee's current lawsuits. there's what appears to be a comprehensive signed contract but still significant grounds for legally challenging it

2018-06-04 10:26:53 UTC  

that's on the level of telling rapists not to rape

2018-06-04 10:26:59 UTC  

the people pulling this shit have a motive

2018-06-04 10:27:06 UTC  

im not dismissing rapists

2018-06-04 10:27:08 UTC  

the problem is having means

2018-06-04 10:27:12 UTC  

im dismissing false accusations of rape

2018-06-04 10:27:20 UTC  

I know

2018-06-04 10:27:33 UTC  

I'm just saying that... the problem is the false accusations have a malicious motive

2018-06-04 10:27:40 UTC  

be it covering your own ass from sleeping with someone

2018-06-04 10:27:46 UTC  

or actually wanting to fuck them over

2018-06-04 10:28:02 UTC  

ah, well some woman deluded by feminists think regret rape is actually a thing

2018-06-04 10:28:09 UTC  

so the question to ask is more like "how can men protect themselves from it" because they're the ones with interest

2018-06-04 10:28:15 UTC  

what us politician is it that refuses to ever be alone with women?

2018-06-04 10:28:16 UTC  

its not like all of them are malicious, if anything I would say most of them have been indoctrinated

2018-06-04 10:28:21 UTC  

just like the question is "how can women protect themselves from rape"

2018-06-04 10:28:24 UTC  

Mike Pence iirc

2018-06-04 10:28:35 UTC  

Mark, I'd say it's a mix

2018-06-04 10:28:41 UTC  

guns 😎

2018-06-04 10:28:41 UTC  

like I said sometimes it's covering your own ass