Message from @Hyddraigon
Discord ID: 453140114726715400
@Deleted User We you able to meet Sargon?
We you
Nah @franti
Can't tame that burly man
@Deleted User ngeroid
I bet he has a grooming set for his beard.
I wish Sargon would stop limiting himself as *just* a working-class British citizen.
@Jab class is too ingrained in the minds of brits
I usually just watch sargons video and lurk occasionally on the sub reddit
but my university is having compulsory courses on "consent"
isnt that somewhat ironic? Forcing people to unvoluntary take training on how to consent 😆
the irony 🤣
I'm just sick of these decisions are made because of a lie they think is true
lots of the "sexual harassment" and "rape" atleast from what I've seen is actually just shit like Staring
When I think of Sargon rock-climbing, I think of a bear running up a steep hill.
He needs to film that
The concept of sexual concent is rammed down our throats daily
And the vast majority of people will agree that sexually taking advantage of someone is shitty behaviour
sargons basically a crypto-yid
@Hyddraigon "consent".
Also, "taking advantage" is insanely subjective
consent is actually pretty objective, imagine any ordinary transaction or contract where both party agree to it
Sorry, the "consent" bit was me being a spelling nazi
Edited
It's objective, the problem is it's rarely put on paper and there aren't usually witnesses because wtf
so it's a little hard to prove
I wonder if that'll change in the future
signed contracts acknowledging consent
on one side it sounds like an absolute moodkiller
Even actual business and contracts can get messy with grey zones around what exactly was agreed to
on another
it might become a de facto necessity
especially if you're in any way significant
look at #metoo inquisition
like I'm sure a lot of it is genuine since there's fucktons of weinstein style scum
the problem is how do you tell which ones
how about if woman think the sex they are going to have is regretful, maybe they shouldnt have sex with that person ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
but apparently, thats me being hyper conservative
dude
Look at Stan Lee's current lawsuits. there's what appears to be a comprehensive signed contract but still significant grounds for legally challenging it