@Deleted User Ah! I see where the miscommunication is. To me 'capitalism' means the ability to freely trade and do business, keep your property, let the market decide, etc. To you it seems 'capitalism' means the financial industry.

you have to see that fascism was a reaction to modernity, not a reaction to oppressive monarchs

Berlin was progressive in the beginning of 20 century.

and to protect it from communism

Every ideology ever is a reaction to modernity.

Berlin had a popular radio station with an openly lesbian radio host.

Every single one.

Oh and now the other fuckboi is awake

well fuck

Ideologies weren't a thing prior to modernity.

No, capitalism puts capital first....GDP above all else

soon the conversation will be about the jews

Prior to the industrial revolution there were no ideologies.

and general will go to shit

Fascists say GDP is VERY IMPORTANT, but not as important as the Nation and People which have to be preserved

eg

thus thats why people say both Communist and Capitalist see the world as economic units (communists as economic classes, capitalists as economic units) -whereas Fascist see a nation and people as a sum of their traditions, heritage history etc

and economics comes second....

As a fan of economics, I've always hated when people fetishize GDP.

What if people don't want to be preserved?

It says nothing about the well being of citizens.

It was a reaction to the capitalist oligarchs....of course, capitalists and commies won that war...so consumerism, materialism won

traditionalism lost

You have to look at development of drug abuse, alcohol abuse, ... This is not a bad indicator.

You're putting tradition above freedom of choice @Deleted User

... among others.

So some say that "Nazis lost a war not an academic debate"

No, freedom of choice is a slogan, its not unbounded by laws and morals anywhere

It's just as dangerous as stating people's value before showing their worth or merit.

Youre sloganeering

"muh freedom"

You're gaslighting

They are not invited to debates, because the guys who tried it, failed miserably with bad outcome (to put it mildly).

You can't hold a serious argument

And you’re in lalaland

No, its a matter of degree

@Deleted User So am I right in believing your brand of fascism would never do away with money, or seize great amounts of taxes or appropriate people's property for government programs?

you're arguing from an extreme

NO one is saying end markets

or end ability to choose products

or whatever you burgers call freedom