could they have ignored them until the USSR was defeated

Thats not very liberalist tbh

No

I doubt it

Because they’d open themselves up for an invasion

Theyd be open to being attacked on 2 fronts

i mentioned this

@haywood you fucking nigger

😆

guys reread what i said jeez

@meratrix you fucking cuck

😀

Imma nuke all you fuckers and become death, destroyer of worls.

my button is bigger

Im rereading and unless you mean something else by "ignore", Idk how me or galm failed to answer

I think he’s asking what if they didn’t waste their resources with the blitz and all that

The blitz as in the strategy?

Blitz as in Britain being bombed by Germany

I have the largest button here

Well that was to prevent britain attacking them

Its not as if they could just ignore britain and britain wouldnt attack them

https://twitter.com/CountDankulaTV/status/1004093176045604865?s=19

It is to get paid to moderate that shitshow

If they left british industry as is and went to go after the USSR, the second fighting starts on the east front the british will start attacking too because they can afford to

So no. You can't "ignore" the british.

buncha neckbeards imagine my SHOCKLES

**"by "ignore" i mean: all defense, no economic wear-down of Britian"**

@Deleted User yes, but does that includes the battle of the Atlantic, im suggesting to cut that entirely

@Escargot sorry, i couldn't find a better word than "ignore"

I don't know how an army is supposed to set up a bulwark defense on one end while splitting itself to conquer oil fields and fight the USSR either

this is how I feel bout this discussion

Japanese kamikaze pilots did nothing wrong either.

hitler lost his chance at winning the moment he crossed the eastern polish border

he had to tho

no he didn't

@Deleted User that was the rational stratedgy