Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 467845032133787648
Facism and totalitarianism is hand in hand. Facism itself is like a middle step between democratic capitalism and co?munism and that was the point of it
I think the difference between fascism and communism can be described as who power is divested in
Facism was basically socialism light
**Tandred#8768** was cleansed from the server.
But if you ignore hitler most facist nations were really not bad, nor as horrible an outcome as socialism itself
Communism hits a wall, because it purports to have shared ownership of everything, while fascism has the government owning everything
Anyone know of any pre ww1 fascist authors at least? Something not tainted with the tragedies of the world wars to have a gander at the subject?
No
Facism wasnt really a thing pree ww1
You probably won't find it labeled as 'fascism'
preww1 it was monarchies
That filled the role of facism
Simmilar but different
Hmm. Will probably have a bit of a research sesh tomorrow and come back if anyone's interested.
Like i said. If you research, focus on spain, japan, italy, and singapore
ah
the worst countries
Aye, will do
far to many default to hitler, but he was only quasi facist
@LumpyAcidFish whenever someone brings up colonialism I always say, hey thank your lucky stars the brits did most of the leg work and not the Spanish.
idk your comparing apples to apples
Howdya mean
it was monarchist
what was the difference between british and spanish colonization
Spain had tons of colonization
and dutch
they both commited the same atrocities
I would say the spanish might have done more
The Hudson Bay co and the NW co were state run monopolies. If you lived in Canada, you worked for "the Company" and bought your goods from "the company"
Well no different that East India Company lol
spanish empire didnt live long enough to do more
True, but small differences
spanish empire destroyed 2 cuvilizations
yeah and the british didnt?
and decimated a third
native americans middle easterns south asians
All of them are still aroubd
India was better off British
The difference between British and Spanish colonisation is that there are still native American tribes in America. You don't see too many South Americans still throwing glass spears at one another and eating hearts for blood gods.