Message from @DecadeUK
Discord ID: 476014573703528450
Fine, I'm not disputing the average results, but the key words in how you've phrased it are 'more likely'. It disregards any merit an individual female may have in relation to overcoming the average. Is that not the arguement we're always fighting against?
The collective?
And how the fuck does affirmative action take the interview into account
If there is no other difference between the candidates, how is the employer meant to make his decision rather than on what already happens in his company
People with dicks work harder on average
I guess you guys have also worked with annoying females
If the female did truly have merit than why is her CV identical to that of the male?
She has nothing on the guy
As a recruiter it's your job to weed them out
The first priority of the business is to make a profit, discrimination is costly to business
Agreed
If the female will work as hard or harder than the male than it is her responsibility to prove that
Money isn't earned by feels
@DecadeUK any last words?
I'm re-reading everything, gimme a min
I'm autistic af btw
NP
Most of us are dude
some evidence BTW
i got another one iyw
Damn forbes is woke
Nah
They're about money
That's their interest
Making money
can it really be considered woke when it's something so obvious?
Not imo
ACC ur probs right, its common knowledge now
I am a single father, and when my boss asks me to work doubleshifts, I make it work. So the family argument falls flat too
Unpaid tasks?
Like what cleaning their desks at the end of a shift?
Cleaning your desk and so on
Also is that for the same job?
Maybe don't be a slob
true
I'm still not sure guys, considering how often SJWs get shouted down for lumping everyone into groups based on gender/race averages or whatever, this still feels hypocritical to me. I support the arguement for individualism but your responses seems contrary to that position?
I know I'm dense, but I'm here to learn
It's fucking bs is what it is