Message from @banestrum
Discord ID: 479137169525571584
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKagRLmcoXM
"I converted my garage, and hung up some curtains."
:dollar:** Support Sargon of Akkad on Maker support and Patreon!** :dollar:
https://www.makersupport.com/sargonofakkad
https://www.patreon.com/sargon
Already a Maker Support / Patreon donator? Send a screenshot to JDM_WAAAT and you will get the Patreon role.
ghfhfhfhdsghfdhf
room mate keeps trying to convince me that everything people do is pre determined
because biology + events = specific outcome
and due to that nobody has free will
and his entire argument hinges on the idea that "The brain if we could map it entirely, is recognizably by a pattern influenced by it's surroundings and therefore we are all just molded by our environment and have no free will"
fshsdhgflksdhfklshfhsdfkl
lol
Just tell him they are turning the frogs gay
Tell him about Quantum Gravity Research, and the emergence of consciousness from complex systems, and how the universe is really just a 4D hologram/quasi-crystal projection from an 8D reality
And dont forget the lizard people
The Reptillians? Yeah, they're coming here and stealin our gold
I say, we send 'em home!
@PurpleFyrus I mean sure, but that's quite a lot of not-free will we have leeway with.
It's rules built on rules, all the way down. To say that's not free will is ridiculous
I'd consider a highly complex system that is beyond the grasp of any single participant a system that is "free"
"SJW" is an offensive term, use "morally challenged" instead.
You think, that with enough private information of enough of a population, it's possible to implement some sort of rudimentary 'psycho-history', a la Isaac Asimov?
Sure, no guarantees on its accuracy, though
Perhaps, but if you trained a neural net with the data....
Well that would also assume a relatively homogenous population
Good luck getting it to figure out memes
Good point there....
I'd guess expense and the possibility of complete failure are what stifles development of that
What self respecting technocrat wants to spend 80 billion on a flop
Why would they need to spend 80 billion? The technologies they have already are enough
@Fitzydog They're not sophisticated enough right not to really be useful for predicting behavior
They're still glorified keyword searchers
*Yet.*
But are they trying to achieve that? Maybe...
<:pepe_eyes:378719408362881024>
**REKTIMU2#2885** was cleansed from the server.
Fraser anning is the man
*L I K E A D A A H G*
@Deleted User don't fuckin at me faggot