Message from @Onyxdood
Discord ID: 488544765655253024
if you go get blackout drunk alone with a guy who has a reputation for that sort of thing
and everyone said "don't do it, something bad will happen"
that's on you
@Onyxdood It's pretty much entirely about that. The modern fight between reason, and sophistry
that's like leaving your car doors unlocked in a bad neighborhood and then complaining when stuff gets stolen
I have very little sympathy
**Charlemagne#7861** was cleansed from the server.
one of them commited it
and the other one put themselves in a position where they knew it was likely to happen
I understand the reason.
If I may ask what is everyone's political leanings? I myself am a minarchist (borderline ancap).
I'm in your boat. Used to be an AnCap, but I like borders too much lol
Lol
I like to think of myself as a social libertarian
but economic more conservative leaning
although I feel like I shouldn't form opinions on stuff I haven't spent a lot of time looking into
so for the most part I have little opinion
@Fitzydog I figured you may of been a ancap once you mentioned Stefan Molyneux
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the sentiment and the logical consistency, but it presupposes that the rest of the world operates on similar axioms to yourself
*Logical Consistency* as it ignores the human nature.
Ideally it does not matter what the rest of the world thinks.
A AnCap society only needs to town or city to operate.
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki But dis-similar from socialism, in that the more people who apply it, the more positive society gets.
You can't complain about *too many* people who mind their own business and don't impede on your own
@Onyxdood wrong, as without the rest of the world agreeing, it would last seconds
Either due to internal, or external threats
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki im not sure I follow
As again, it ignores human nature to want more, be it land/power/prestige, ect.
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki No, it takes that perfectly into account. It ignores people who *don't* do that, like radical islam
Ancapianism is based on the need that all agree 100% to the 'Non-Agreession'
No because all it takes is someone with enough money to buy an army to take over everything.
Or an outside state to do so
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Every modern person in the west already abides by the NAP, tbh.
Because there is a state enforcing it.
^
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki That's the same logic that God is why people are moral
I agree with a outside state, but someone simply buying a huge would be stopped before it got out of hand.