Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki

Discord ID: 488546321754619904


2018-09-10 03:01:36 UTC  

Lol

2018-09-10 03:01:38 UTC  

I like to think of myself as a social libertarian

2018-09-10 03:01:46 UTC  

but economic more conservative leaning

2018-09-10 03:02:12 UTC  

although I feel like I shouldn't form opinions on stuff I haven't spent a lot of time looking into

2018-09-10 03:02:18 UTC  

so for the most part I have little opinion

2018-09-10 03:02:28 UTC  

Fair enough

2018-09-10 03:03:34 UTC  

@Fitzydog I figured you may of been a ancap once you mentioned Stefan Molyneux

2018-09-10 03:04:34 UTC  

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the sentiment and the logical consistency, but it presupposes that the rest of the world operates on similar axioms to yourself

2018-09-10 03:05:34 UTC  

*Logical Consistency* as it ignores the human nature.

2018-09-10 03:05:46 UTC  

Ideally it does not matter what the rest of the world thinks.

2018-09-10 03:06:14 UTC  

A AnCap society only needs to town or city to operate.

2018-09-10 03:06:16 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki But dis-similar from socialism, in that the more people who apply it, the more positive society gets.

2018-09-10 03:06:45 UTC  

You can't complain about *too many* people who mind their own business and don't impede on your own

2018-09-10 03:06:47 UTC  

@Onyxdood wrong, as without the rest of the world agreeing, it would last seconds

2018-09-10 03:07:06 UTC  

Either due to internal, or external threats

2018-09-10 03:07:32 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki im not sure I follow

2018-09-10 03:07:33 UTC  

As again, it ignores human nature to want more, be it land/power/prestige, ect.

2018-09-10 03:08:00 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki No, it takes that perfectly into account. It ignores people who *don't* do that, like radical islam

2018-09-10 03:08:04 UTC  

Ancapianism is based on the need that all agree 100% to the 'Non-Agreession'

2018-09-10 03:08:31 UTC  

No because all it takes is someone with enough money to buy an army to take over everything.

2018-09-10 03:08:39 UTC  

Or an outside state to do so

2018-09-10 03:09:06 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Every modern person in the west already abides by the NAP, tbh.

2018-09-10 03:09:21 UTC  

Because there is a state enforcing it.

2018-09-10 03:09:31 UTC  

^

2018-09-10 03:09:36 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki That's the same logic that God is why people are moral

2018-09-10 03:09:42 UTC  

I agree with a outside state, but someone simply buying a huge would be stopped before it got out of hand.

2018-09-10 03:09:43 UTC  

Wrong

2018-09-10 03:10:16 UTC  

The state holds the monopoly of power, so protects the peoples property rights and so on. When a state doesnt you have essentially mexico, with cartels running things

2018-09-10 03:10:22 UTC  

Either in shadows, or directly

2018-09-10 03:10:27 UTC  

The state is the exact opposite of the NAP

2018-09-10 03:10:58 UTC  

The state hardly does anything to protect your property, in a practical day-to-day sense. You do

2018-09-10 03:11:45 UTC  

Wrong, the state holds laws that protect your right to personal property

2018-09-10 03:11:58 UTC  

While also violating the same rights

2018-09-10 03:11:59 UTC  

If your home is broken into, the police investigate and so on.

2018-09-10 03:12:22 UTC  

If you say 'Taxes are a violation of property' grow up

2018-09-10 03:12:22 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki But in the end, it's not the laws that *prevent* damage or theft of your property. It's YOU and your actions.

2018-09-10 03:12:35 UTC  

Actually it is laws to prevent

2018-09-10 03:12:37 UTC  

Have you never heard of eminent domain?

2018-09-10 03:12:40 UTC  

As a deterrant

2018-09-10 03:13:17 UTC  

Eminent Domain requires a payment for such, of equal value

2018-09-10 03:13:28 UTC  

I would also appreciate if we don't attack each other with insults