@Onyxdood wrong, as without the rest of the world agreeing, it would last seconds

Either due to internal, or external threats

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki im not sure I follow

As again, it ignores human nature to want more, be it land/power/prestige, ect.

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki No, it takes that perfectly into account. It ignores people who *don't* do that, like radical islam

Ancapianism is based on the need that all agree 100% to the 'Non-Agreession'

No because all it takes is someone with enough money to buy an army to take over everything.

Or an outside state to do so

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Every modern person in the west already abides by the NAP, tbh.

Because there is a state enforcing it.

^

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki That's the same logic that God is why people are moral

I agree with a outside state, but someone simply buying a huge would be stopped before it got out of hand.

Wrong

The state holds the monopoly of power, so protects the peoples property rights and so on. When a state doesnt you have essentially mexico, with cartels running things

Either in shadows, or directly

The state is the exact opposite of the NAP

The state hardly does anything to protect your property, in a practical day-to-day sense. You do

Wrong, the state holds laws that protect your right to personal property

While also violating the same rights

If your home is broken into, the police investigate and so on.

If you say 'Taxes are a violation of property' grow up

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki But in the end, it's not the laws that *prevent* damage or theft of your property. It's YOU and your actions.

Actually it is laws to prevent

Have you never heard of eminent domain?

As a deterrant

Eminent Domain requires a payment for such, of equal value

I would also appreciate if we don't attack each other with insults

@Onyxdood Ehh, that's debateable as to how well laws work as a deterrent. I'd say you and your firearm at home do more than the police ever do.

I have heard of eminent domain, and believe it should be more limited

^ Yes, and the powers of such is highly limited by the constitution and Legal President

Precident*

Also, a whole nother discussion lol

The same legal Powers have been slowly but surely expanding over the course of hundreds of years

As is the nature of the state

And the people keep the state in check, its all check and balances all the way down.

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki But, to explore your question: How are local police paid with property taxes municipally, not an extension of the NAP?

I never said it wasn't.
I said NAP ONLY works with State enforcement

They'll always come a point where the state cannot be checked by people

Maybe in one without the express set up like the US

Then how do we ask the people keep something like the NSA in check?