Message from @Broo TulsiGang 2024 π¬π§ πΊπΈ
Discord ID: 490556429300924416
how so?
The slow creep of federal power and centralization
didnt you mean the federalists?
Federal power is federalist
Federalist
1. relating to or denoting a system of government in which several states unite under a central authority.
I would argue most of the admendments and article 5 are all anti federalist. Cause it puts the people or the states above the federal.
They were more confederationists
Yes, sorry. Got them backwards. I colloquially just say 'centralized' vs 'decentralized' instead of referring to federalism
than anti-federalists
fair enough
just watched that, actually laughed my ass off at her fucking tantrum
Take it out on the right person, it'll go alot better for you
I'm not even sure what those things are
I like Senna, Ferraris, Beer and Hot Women
I'm not an expert on body pillows
*ha*
**Robbi373#0884** was cleansed from the server.
cucks buy it anyway
so they pay for your R&D
Nintendos are for children and cucks
iphone gen 1 was useless, people lined up for hours to spend $500 cuck on that garbage
wii 1 was trash
can confirm my wife wasn't much of an iphone person
Gender is a spectum
@Deleted User There's an academic split between what was the bigger influence on the US founding fathers. Classical liberalism, or classical republicanism
Chad level gaming is building a gaming PC in a slim case, and using a gamepad
All of them had an impact my dude
people just like to focus on the ones they agree with the most
do you also has much grammars?
and cherry pick those individuals
My gaming PC is a tiny bit bigger than a PS3, with no optical drive
"Whatever policies Pinochetβs civilian successors inherited from him werenβt from the free market shock period but from the post-debt crisis cleanup, a departure from orthodoxy that began with kicking out the Chicago Boys, expanding public payrolls, reinstating the minimum wage, and nationalizing the banks. Some they were stuck with, like Chileβs privatized social security system, once the shining example to the world championed by the World Bank, until it wasnβt. By 2008, the government found it in in drastic need of an overhaul, citing low rates of coverage, high administrative fees eating up to 33 cents of every dollar spent, and low average benefits necessitating government subsidies for retirees who would otherwise live out their last days in poverty."
How is it that "trickle down economics", monetarism, and free market privatizations always and consistently fail in a this manner?
>Private SS
> Govt admin costs
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
So it's not private SS, it's just a less functional and more corrupt govt pension program