isnt the idea of animal species and natural selection to have those with the best genes reproduce to extend the lineage of their biological group

yes but it doesnt always work that way

About that healthcare/abortion argument earlier, in past times, adults used to take care of their parents, and the private sector is better suited for taking care of the needy instead of redistribution of wealth, anyway, but I'm interrupting.

The biological purpose of gays is to be house servants for the Ruler's concubines.

@Durtle02 homosexuality has existed in all known cultures completely independently (Polynesians who have been isolated for 8,000 years for example) since recorded history and it's been observed in most mammals as well it is not learned behavior

a lot of homosexuality in animals isnt fucking though

Some chimps fuck frogs. Does that have a genetic origin and purpose as well?

a group of otters fucking a dead seal corpse isn't 'learned' either but they still do it

Sure but that's due to their being animals who only run on instinct, they will still *try* to fuck

I could say the same about homosexuality

What do you mean

Have they found a gene that makes people gay?

The treatment of homosexuals and their behavior/culture has changed but the rate at which gay people exist is a relative constant

no they were just saying that its part environmental @Deleted User

That is why i was asking about the gene

because percentages...

i think there seems to be more gay people cause you would be killed a few years ago

My hypothesis is external interfereance or teenage mothers not producing addequite prenatal testosterone

You also have to consider than sexuality isn't as clear-cut as gay straight bisexual, for instance someone who is bisexual might in one instance revile homosexuality and never realize that they are bisexual because they've just been content with heterosexual relationships, while in another era the same person might discover their homo side first

It's still not *normal.*

@Fitzydog and you're the arbiter of normality are you?

@Dwarforn I think that very well could be the case

Lol

Muh appeal to nature

Can you think of a concept less objective than normality, honestly?

Natural

fucking normies ree

Try naming one thing that is objectively "normal"

It's *abnormal* for someone to have psoriasis, and yet it still exists from genetics.

Women having babies

teenage motherhood is certainly correlative to the increase, perhaps there is a connection.

99 Percent true

the one percent

It's *normal* for human males to be physically attracted to female sexual organs.

I literally don't care if you thing being gay is normal or not, there is no liberal argument for telling consenting adults what they're allowed to do in private or for denying them rights simply because you disapprove.

@radeon I didn't say there was.

@Fitzydog you're confusing normal any typical

Its usually a biologically incentivised in the male to mate with the female, and for their sight to be attracted to female organs

I don't care what people do to each other.

Just don't claim it's normal.

What is your point then? Yes, most people aren't gay, but some people are, so what?

Its not normal