Message from @gonejamin
Discord ID: 569187576657870849
idk that thought is funny tho
Perants don't own their children lol
@gonejamin makes perfect sense in an ancap framework
SERVICE GUARANTEES CITIZENSHIP
IMPLEMENT STARSHIP TROOPERS SYSTEM
I do t care where you say it makes sense
I would like to know more
What you are saying is wrong
<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>
kek
thanks LBJ
`Now if a parent may own his child (within the framework of non-aggression and runaway freedom), then he may also transfer that ownership to someone else. He may give the child out for adoption, or he may sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. In short, we must face the fact that the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children. Superficially, this sounds monstrous and inhuman. But closer thought will reveal the superior humanism of such a market. For we must realize that there is a market for children now, but that since the government prohibits sale of children at a price, the parents may now only give their children away to a licensed adoption agency free of charge`
this is rothbard lol
tero y
But also, I'm not *interested* enough to even talk about this again lol
The issue is you are talking of children like they are things not people
not i
Oh god, it's a repeat of last month
Are you a simple baiter sir?
i'm criticizing ancapism
@gonejaminAre you a simpleton?
yeah
he is
Why are you criticizing him for discussion?
at least rothbard understands where an-cap would lead lul
rather than just denying that it would
I thought he was pushing a agenda for the sake of reees
my position: ancap bad
The quality of discussion here has plummeted since the newfags joined
proper balance between regulation and market freedom != ancap
mUh ElItIsM
Sure
Us poor Grey's
where that balance is, we know on some things, not all
Ruining the server for everyone
only a few
damn greys
they ruined scotland