@Tero I don't agree with Rothbard 100% so....

But also, I'm not *interested* enough to even talk about this again lol

The issue is you are talking of children like they are things not people

not i

Oh god, it's a repeat of last month

Then why you talking about it ?

Are you a simple baiter sir?

i'm criticizing ancapism

@gonejaminAre you a simpleton?

yeah

he is

Why are you criticizing him for discussion?

at least rothbard understands where an-cap would lead lul

rather than just denying that it would

I thought he was pushing a agenda for the sake of reees

my position: ancap bad

The quality of discussion here has plummeted since the newfags joined

proper balance between regulation and market freedom != ancap

mUh ElItIsM

Sure

Us poor Grey's

where that balance is, we know on some things, not all

Ruining the server for everyone

only a few

damn greys

they ruined scotland

how dare those greys, filthy, i tell you.

we need to change the grey name colour to the discord background colour

"Does anyone else hate this thing that I personally call AnCap philosophy?"
> proceeds to butcher a 1-dimensional strawman argument of vanilla libertarian free market economics

do the space marines have the authority or do we need durtle?

Idk anymore

you know ancap philosophy exists, right?

like

i'm not just "making something up"

`On the other hand, the two other grounds for seizing children from their parents, both coming under the broad rubric of "child neglect," clearly violate parental rights. These are: failure to provide children with the "proper" food, shelter, medical care, or education; and failure to provide children with a "fit environment."`
rothbard is actually pretty based tho

@PartlyAwesome Yes, I'm the resident AnCap here

least he's consistent

and is there anything i said that doesn't conform with said ancap philosophy?

Yes

Mom, dad..stop fighting please