Message from @gonejamin

Discord ID: 569186754704179241


2019-04-20 15:42:12 UTC  

yeah so there can't be such a contract

2019-04-20 15:42:27 UTC  

@Tero No, the contract exists, but it works one way

2019-04-20 15:42:37 UTC  

that's retarded you can't have a contract with yourself

2019-04-20 15:42:54 UTC  

Jfc this is a topic for another time

2019-04-20 15:42:56 UTC  

You are singed into a contract upon birth right with your birth certificate?

2019-04-20 15:43:15 UTC  

Which binds your name to the state

2019-04-20 15:43:20 UTC  

that's why we don't know if universal health care would work in the states, even if implemented "properly"
it's too large a country, it's different fundamentally from every other country

2019-04-20 15:43:34 UTC  

anyway, the parents make the child and thus as a product of their labour, it is their property

2019-04-20 15:43:38 UTC  

citizenship is unconcentual OMEGALUL

2019-04-20 15:43:48 UTC  
2019-04-20 15:43:51 UTC  
2019-04-20 15:44:00 UTC  

@Tero stupid comment

2019-04-20 15:44:01 UTC  

idk that thought is funny tho

2019-04-20 15:44:09 UTC  

Perants don't own their children lol

2019-04-20 15:44:12 UTC  

@gonejamin makes perfect sense in an ancap framework

2019-04-20 15:44:13 UTC  

SERVICE GUARANTEES CITIZENSHIP

2019-04-20 15:44:26 UTC  

IMPLEMENT STARSHIP TROOPERS SYSTEM

2019-04-20 15:44:35 UTC  

@Angus Stratocracy

2019-04-20 15:44:49 UTC  

I do t care where you say it makes sense

2019-04-20 15:44:51 UTC  

I would like to know more

2019-04-20 15:44:57 UTC  

What you are saying is wrong

2019-04-20 15:45:01 UTC  

<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>

2019-04-20 15:45:11 UTC  

kek

2019-04-20 15:46:47 UTC  

thanks LBJ

2019-04-20 15:46:55 UTC  

`Now if a parent may own his child (within the framework of non-aggression and runaway freedom), then he may also transfer that ownership to someone else. He may give the child out for adoption, or he may sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. In short, we must face the fact that the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children. Superficially, this sounds monstrous and inhuman. But closer thought will reveal the superior humanism of such a market. For we must realize that there is a market for children now, but that since the government prohibits sale of children at a price, the parents may now only give their children away to a licensed adoption agency free of charge`
this is rothbard lol

2019-04-20 15:47:11 UTC  

tero y

2019-04-20 15:47:13 UTC  

@Tero I don't agree with Rothbard 100% so....

2019-04-20 15:47:38 UTC  

But also, I'm not *interested* enough to even talk about this again lol

2019-04-20 15:47:52 UTC  

The issue is you are talking of children like they are things not people

2019-04-20 15:48:00 UTC  

not i

2019-04-20 15:48:06 UTC  

Oh god, it's a repeat of last month

2019-04-20 15:48:13 UTC  

Then why you talking about it ?

2019-04-20 15:48:20 UTC  

Are you a simple baiter sir?

2019-04-20 15:48:25 UTC  

i'm criticizing ancapism

2019-04-20 15:48:30 UTC  

@gonejaminAre you a simpleton?

2019-04-20 15:48:33 UTC  

yeah

2019-04-20 15:48:35 UTC  

he is

2019-04-20 15:48:50 UTC  

Why are you criticizing him for discussion?

2019-04-20 15:48:54 UTC  

at least rothbard understands where an-cap would lead lul

2019-04-20 15:49:08 UTC  

rather than just denying that it would