<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>

https://i.redd.it/oiy75xzuyet21.jpg

kek

thanks LBJ

`Now if a parent may own his child (within the framework of non-aggression and runaway freedom), then he may also transfer that ownership to someone else. He may give the child out for adoption, or he may sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. In short, we must face the fact that the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children. Superficially, this sounds monstrous and inhuman. But closer thought will reveal the superior humanism of such a market. For we must realize that there is a market for children now, but that since the government prohibits sale of children at a price, the parents may now only give their children away to a licensed adoption agency free of charge`
this is rothbard lol

tero y

@Tero I don't agree with Rothbard 100% so....

But also, I'm not *interested* enough to even talk about this again lol

The issue is you are talking of children like they are things not people

not i

Oh god, it's a repeat of last month

Then why you talking about it ?

Are you a simple baiter sir?

i'm criticizing ancapism

@gonejaminAre you a simpleton?

yeah

he is

Why are you criticizing him for discussion?

at least rothbard understands where an-cap would lead lul

rather than just denying that it would

I thought he was pushing a agenda for the sake of reees

my position: ancap bad

The quality of discussion here has plummeted since the newfags joined

proper balance between regulation and market freedom != ancap

mUh ElItIsM

Sure

Us poor Grey's

where that balance is, we know on some things, not all

Ruining the server for everyone

only a few

damn greys

they ruined scotland

how dare those greys, filthy, i tell you.

we need to change the grey name colour to the discord background colour

"Does anyone else hate this thing that I personally call AnCap philosophy?"
> proceeds to butcher a 1-dimensional strawman argument of vanilla libertarian free market economics

do the space marines have the authority or do we need durtle?

Idk anymore

you know ancap philosophy exists, right?

like

i'm not just "making something up"

`On the other hand, the two other grounds for seizing children from their parents, both coming under the broad rubric of "child neglect," clearly violate parental rights. These are: failure to provide children with the "proper" food, shelter, medical care, or education; and failure to provide children with a "fit environment."`
rothbard is actually pretty based tho