Message from @Largezo112
Discord ID: 576145559186833448
Pew even predicted the results of the 2016 election after it happened.
the 2016 election was supposed to be Hillary's because of demographics. That didn't happen. Now one can interpret the results in two ways: 1. It was the last bitter cry for help from the boomers who'll soon be dead or 2. The start of a new political era in which people if not become at least will vote more conservatively. Why do i think that is the case? Because during the past 10 years our situation and future prospects have deteriorated all across the western world. Europe was ran over by migrants, there have been dozens of terrorist attacks, a prolonged economic crisis and the loss of jobs to China and other asian countries. Authorities in western europe have grown more and more totalitarian. The middle east is a powder keg as always and the rise of China means that the far-east will become one as well. The media tells the average guy to shut up and accept the irrevocable loss of his culture, faith, traditions and habits as the new normal while arguing freedom of speech only for themselves. Because we clearly live in uncertain and troubled times people will vote for 1. strong leader 2. change. Obama, Merkel, Macron and other leftists have only perpetrated the status quo. In short, people have seen what has happened and correctly deduced that their political elite is the main culprit of that and want to vote them out. Is that a good argument?
the elections are much more nuanced that "muh demographics"
but that's the American way of looking at it, every ethnic group is their own little tribe who only further their own interests and cannot co-operate
By that logic Catholics and Protestants would never vote for the same president?
why did that happen?
because the alternative was even worse
so in short, people in general are able to look beyond their immediate surroundings and think about the future
By your logic i would vote for "center-right cucks" every time because i have affluent background
I don't get why you think that after this cycle, most people, the majority of voters, are going to become more conservative? My impression is the opposite is true. @Largezo112
i just tried to explain why above @Fully Buckminstered
``Obama, Merkel, Macron and other leftists have only perpetrated the status quo. In short, people have seen what has happened and correctly deduced that their political elite is the main culprit of that and want to vote them out. Is that a good argument?`` Respectfully, I agree with this I just disagree with your conclusion. Historically we drift to the left, like a force of nature. And I personally believe that the majority of voters will simply double down, accepting the version of reality fed them by academics, politicians, and journalists. In the US, the bunk narrative surrounding Trump is so pervasive, and its main function has been to justify in people's minds the need for "change," in the form of more extreme left politics. Everything was balanced on a knife edge in 2016. Yes people are tired of the status quo, but the liberal establishment has done its job too well. Just my $0.02. We'll see.
rofl
honk honk
the cops ought to be executed for misgendering him
i think California is rotten
we should take the east and amputate the coast
It's 2019 and the Guardtards (is that a good nickname?) still believe in motherfucking Varoufakis. 🤦🏻
http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2019/may/10/can-yanis-varoufakis-save-europe-video
Cuba has banned a gay pride parade, I'm sure the commie fag @ebowden is now quite the sad man.
http://www.abc.es/sociedad/abci-cuba-censura-tradicional-marcha-201905100218_noticia.html
Red pilled and baste, not liking commies censoring people makes you a commie.
Here we see that famous alleged high IQ shining through.
You're a fag and, if you leaned any more to the left, you could be the ultimate oval racing driver.
Lol
I dislike filthy commies censoring people, a true leftist.
My god, you never recovered from the great re-post.
38m (40+yds) at an average of 33º.
Yes, things you don't like are good to censor and things you like should not be censored. Believe me, I understand, I've heard it all before from every type of wannabe despot under the sun.
called it
Lol, Tom went with the "paradox of tolerance" argument.
The types of people eCUNTden protects:
· Fags
· Commies
· Commie fags
Absolutely, even filthy communists, even those of them that call for the culling of freedoms, get freedom. I really like that US constitution and how everyone gets their slice of the liberty pie.
That said, I am not averse to the idea of people not being burdened by liberties they don't want. If someone doesn't believe in a right to fair trial, I wouldn't mind them being allowed to experience the government they so desperately want if they stood accused.