You know that "golden middle way" is figure of speech, don't you?

But what comes to labor based economy how would you evaluate how much labor did the producer of X put into it? Also is certain labor more valuable than another kind of labor?

mohism sounds pretty based

sure some labor is def more valuable

doctor military farmer management

high value jobs and labor

its not communism and you could should and would have private business's

Now then... How would you regulate the businesses to pay for the labor and not for the result? Would you for example need to pay more for lumberjack that uses manual saw than to lumberjack that used Ponsse scorpion on same job, the guys with saw sure did more labor but the amount of trees he was able to cut was ignisificant to comparison to the ponsse drivers result
Same way on the field, would you need to pay more for guy with scythe even tho guy with combine harvester managed to yield bigger results with less labor.
Now if you would do the classical communist way then you would say that the labor=hours on the job
But this leads to be beneficial to niggers you see
Nigger and white guy both come to job 8am and leave 5pm, both get same pay cause they spend same amount of time on the job, but white guy did 90% of the work there.

I can't get over this

It's so funny

@Finno that’s why Communism and labor based economies will fall, there’s an unsolvable freeloader problem

Yeah exactly

Also Mohism's idea of "impartial care" is fucking stupid and the whole philosophy is not "based" at all

Even legalists could be argued to be more "based" than mohists

If he's "hate speech" then I'm fucked

I don't see your whining now, @ebowden, someone posted one thing TWICE in 2 sections. Maybe you don't dislike the act, just the author. BTW, that's what cunts do. <:Thoughts:408715607555702784>

you sound mad

also he didn't even bring it up in the first place

DeusVult never accused me, Ecuntden did. 😉

@.drib Do you ever find out that you're supposed to be someone's enemy, having had no idea of the apparent relationship prior?

Of course I'm gonna dislike a whiny double-standard-carrying cunt.

you sound mad

I said that to him because he brought it up, and at the time only one person was doing it, and doing it to a greater extent than I had ever seen before.

So no, not really a double standard unless you are super assmad.

its not that big of a deal druiz <:untricked:562479995835121686>

Are you gonna make me search for instances? A dude did it not even 15 minutes ago (it's why I mentioned you) and I've seen MANY people do it.

I never, not once claimed that other people did not do it.

Work on your english comprehension.

And take a chill pill while you're at it, too.

You just mentioned me, I know of SEVERAL users doing it.

I don't need to chill, I need you to either apologize for your double standards or STFU.

<:untricked:562479995835121686>

lololololol

I mentioned you because at that particular time you were the one doing it, and to great excess. Other people do it, and it can even be quite appropriate, you got mentioned because someone brought up the huge influx at that time, not seeming to realise that it was only one person in that particular case.

@.drib On the bright side this person has a very lovely dog.

On the brighter side, cunts like you have a short life expectancy.

Lol

That's a LOT of assmad.