Message from @Johnny5
Discord ID: 576154156667109377
your welcome.
no one is alergic to sulfur... you would be dead.
or i got way too much in my body already and i hit my tolerance level
can't it's water soluble your body would expel it.
Does anyone have other views on other random supplements please also .. like apple cider vinegar reviews .. bicarbonate soda reviews ? Or any other things that come to mind
it mostly comes out as farts
i have to avoid whole eggs because of it
take apple cider vinegar after a meal. about a table spoon.
even the yokes
After each meal @Zenmaster ? What other things is in your diet
What is in your diet also @SirW00f please? Anything that most don’t add in ?
There was an article about a mother suing MSM because they used her child's photo as a measles break out anyone have a link i cant find it anywhere. thanks ahead of time even if no one does
@SirW00f you may want to add silica and magnesium if you seem to be having trouble with sulfur. I’ll try to find the video about it and link it.
@SirW00f
Wow, found it quicker than I thought I would. But she talks about how glyphosate contributes to sulfur sensitivity and how to address it.
It’s long but an excellent video
https://youtu.be/CmAsTrsUjBc
Hey Anon Brothers & Sisters!
I'm a Q follower and enjoy watching Dustin Nemos & other channels. I seen David Getoff on Dustin's channel and went to his website. I was getting into his lecture on microwaves when I immediately recognized he was wrong regarding his classification of microwaves as "ionizing" radiation. (I have a chemistry and nuclear background). I was really hoping he was legit, but now I'm questioning how valuable his information is...
Near ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, microwave, radio waves, and low-frequency radio frequency (longwave) are all examples of non-ionizing radiation. By contrast, far ultraviolet light, X-rays, gamma-rays, and all particle radiation from radioactive decay are ionizing.
Anyway, I'm just trying to help avoid those who mislead for their own agendas...
@Johnny5 did you DM @Dustin Nemos regarding that info? It’s worth noting!
still pulses at same freq as normal bulbs or cfl's
A study by UC Irvine’s Department of Population Health & Disease Prevention has discovered that LED diodes contain unsafe levels of carcinogenic toxins. While LED’s less energy friendly cousin’s, CFLs, contain a measured amount of mercury, LEDs are laden with lead, arsenic and a handful of other chemicals that have been linked to different cancers, neurological damage, kidney disease, hypertension, skin rashes and other serious illnesses. Not only are these chemicals harmful to consumers if the bulbs are mishandled or broken. They recommend a hazmat suit anytime you break a LED bulb and not enter into the area for up to 6-8 hrs after breaking a LED light bulb. Extremely toxic.
so...no eating of led bulbs...got it
Or breaking them
actually whats inside the bulb is a circuit array of leds and some lead based solder traces between the circuit array of leds and the power source
harmful amounts of mercury are released if one of the new “green” bulbs breaks, experts have now discovered they also emit several carcinogenic chemicals.
These include phenol – a poison used by the Nazis to kill concentration camp victims – and the toxins naphthalene and styrene, which are released as a form of steam when the bulb is switched on.
LED and CFLs
those last 2 are in the plastic bulb part
blame the industry for moving away from glass based bulbs
That fact is just switching them on not even broken emits phenol and other toxins. By design. It’s meant to kill you.
🤔😁
all the tech could be encased inside the glass base version and not release any toxins ...but nobody wants to go glass anymore
Exactly! They know what they are doing.
Have a great day @SirW00f