Message from @Doc
Discord ID: 796407351434280980
the president can just pardon him right
or if he cant get the state gov to do it
as hes a republican
can't pardon someone who hasn't been convicted
"Show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime.”
- Lavrentiy Beria, head of Joseph Stalin’s secret police. @Neph (Nec) / Krystaps (War)#6654
This is not true. The crime only requires to have taken place.
```While pardons are typically given to people who have been prosecuted, they can cover conduct that has not resulted in legal proceedings.
A pardon cannot apply to conduct that has not yet occurred.
The U.S. Supreme Court clarified this in a 1866 case, saying the pardon power “extends to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
Most pardons are issued to people who have been prosecuted and sentenced. But in 1977, President Jimmy Carter pardoned hundreds of thousands of “draft dodgers” who avoided a government-imposed obligation to serve in the Vietnam War.```
does anyone wonder why Kyle Rittenhouse was charged frivolously?
I doubt anyone wonders why at this point. It's obviously intended to make him a political football.
Rittenhouse will be back in court on March 10, and the trial is scheduled for March 29.
The reason he's undergoing a trial is because this was a highly publicized shooting with two people that died. It's par for the course.
Honestly don't think it's entirely political, but politics is a big factor for sure.
It’s a travesty that Blake isn’t facing charges.
who is blake in this muppetshow again?
i didn't catch the last hearing - when is Rittenhouse's next court date? And when does the trial actually start?
I think the trial starts the end of March... the 29th, I think.
After Hours: Investigating Big Tech MUST WATCH!!!
Censorship by Full Measure After Hours • A podcast on Anchor
https://anchor.fm/sharylattkisson/episodes/After-Hours-Investigating-Big-Tech-Censorship-eojrn1
@Shifrah, you just advanced to level 1!
Prosecutors are trying to revoke Kyle's bail because he gave the ok sign when he was at the bar. Truly we live in clown world.
That is ridiculous! Someone needs to show the prosecutor the emoji 👌🏼
Political prosecutions are disgusting
I miss when 👌 was an Illuminati symbol
That prosecutor is more criminal than kyle imho
I dont think rittenhouse is guilty of any crimes.
Not letting yourself get lynched by a mob is a crime now I guess. Wouldn't be surprised to see emojis become illegal under the Harris Administration.
Giant voice is a military emergency alert broadcast system
I dont think theres gonna be a harris admin
I think epstein is telling
I actually think he was very controlled, considering the situation he was in & only being 17. If that’s not self defence I don’t know what is 🤷🏼♀️
That dude was surgical
The ONLY problem that I see of him is that many States have written into their "Self Defense laws" that the person claiming Self Defense can have ZERO fault in the confrontation. Now, having said that some of those same State's will say you can still claim self defense if you attempted to escape the situation (which based on what I have seen he was trying to escape).
I watched the preliminary hearing and the cop that testified helped Rittenhouse a lot. Unless there is other video evidence that we have no seen yet then I can't imagine he would be convicted of anything other than a gun issue (17 running around the streets with a long rifle is, generally speaking, illegal)
So, if I were on the jury there is no way I could convict him based on the evidence I have seen so far.
I thought they dropped the gun charge?
The only fault of his in thr confrontation was from extinguishing a fire