Message from @Kaiser
Discord ID: 799140378103119873
Make claim. Ignore reality. Repeat.
i didnt get arrested
There was no voter fraud because no voter fraud was proven
Like they will for the capitol too......https://twitter.com/FBI/status/1349550250307055622?s=19
@Zuluzeit yes, that's why making claims should be allowed regardless if they are true or not
That makes no sense... Trump claimed that 100% of law enforcement agencies endorsed his campaign. Do you mean to tell me that they were all in on it and refused to pursue fraud cases or follow up on evidence that was presented??? Is Trump's loyalty in law enforcement that anemic?
10 investigations into Benghazi with Hillary testifying 11 hours turns up nothing - youll never prove innocence
60 court cases across 90 judges present no evidence of fraud - the fraud is obvious you’ll never disprove it
That's how proof works.
There is no place for facts in politics.
@TaLoN132 facts don't exist in 2020, facts are what is written after the fact. Go to any wiki page and you will see history being re-written on the daily basis.
This are two very contradicting statements 😉
Yes... One was sarcasm.
and very few prosecutions:
https://www.courthousenews.com/portland-da-wont-pursue-charges-against-most-protesters/
They don’t even need a court to show fraud just turn over what you have to the cops.
Gotta remember, they deputized officers later on and those charges were federal.
So... Trump lied about Law Enforcement supporting him? They didn't have his back.
@TaLoN132 Can there be voter fraud if the vote is counted while unsupervised? Can the counter have a different set of rules for different candidates? One smudge is worthy of correcting to fill the 'biden' mark and another smudge is unworth of correction and should be tossed?
Legit question, is there a reason for supervision of vote counting or is it not possible for the counter to be biased
None of that happened... Made up stories is not proof of anything.
CAN IT
I'm not saying it did, if unsupervised, can a counter commit fraud in this manner?
> So... Trump lied about Law Enforcement supporting him? They didn't have his back.
@TaLoN132 No, they can vacillate between true and false, depending on the point. It's a great way to be taken seriously and then become enraged when it turns out no one is obligated to believe what they say.
you mean three times in a row once when at least two eyeballs had to look at the ballot and twice when the machine counted it? like what happened in GA?
thats not correct
There are checks and balances built into the entire process. Signature checks are done in bipartisan groups. Adjudications are done in bipartisan groups. There are observers to makes sure that these processes are followed. I have not seen any evidence that this did not occur... Except one video where the election manager in Coffee County GA - which was heavily Trump - claimed she did the adjudications by herself. She is under investigation.
I choose to remain ignorant of the processes. Therefore they don't exist and any claim flies.
@TaLoN132 So you are saying, if left unsupervised, there can be fraud in that manner, but it wasn't proven that votes were counted unsupervised?
Been busy today
One of those is a recently revealed blue state. Maybe he forgot.
What is your point??? If you are trying to say that votes were counted unsupervised in GA on election night, you would be wrong.
what votes are we talking about?
That's what I'm trying to figure out... He's doing the used car salesman thing. If you can put this much down and I can get my manager to agree to this much a month, do we have a deal?
Tons of those cases were not even rejected by the judges. The lawyers said yeah there’s no case here voluntary dismissal. Then they say well I didn’t have a chance to present evidence? Is that all it takes opening up a flurry of cases then dropping them?
My point isn't that there was fraud or there wasn't, my point is that it
there could've been, and simply stating that there wasn't because none was proven does not mean that there wasn't.
We've all been in the boat where the cost of an attorney would outweigh the potential reward of winning a case... Does that mean that there was no wrongdoing? No, it just means that if you go to trial you will likely end up doing yourself more harm than good.