Message from @Kaiser
Discord ID: 799139142998818888
This is usually how it goes. There's expectations for sequels.
And yet there were many, many arrests.
Yes, but you see where I'm going with this
That will be a surprise to all the people who were arrested.
Arrest vs prosecution? And operation legend made plenty...
Nice try, though...
They were slow. But they came.
@TaLoN132 that is not the point, the point is that if you write the history you can't then claim the history as the proof that the history is correct
Literally everyone was arrested. Change my mind.
This is easy.
Make claim. Ignore reality. Repeat.
i didnt get arrested
There was no voter fraud because no voter fraud was proven
Like they will for the capitol too......https://twitter.com/FBI/status/1349550250307055622?s=19
@Zuluzeit yes, that's why making claims should be allowed regardless if they are true or not
That makes no sense... Trump claimed that 100% of law enforcement agencies endorsed his campaign. Do you mean to tell me that they were all in on it and refused to pursue fraud cases or follow up on evidence that was presented??? Is Trump's loyalty in law enforcement that anemic?
10 investigations into Benghazi with Hillary testifying 11 hours turns up nothing - youll never prove innocence
60 court cases across 90 judges present no evidence of fraud - the fraud is obvious you’ll never disprove it
That's how proof works.
There is no place for facts in politics.
@TaLoN132 facts don't exist in 2020, facts are what is written after the fact. Go to any wiki page and you will see history being re-written on the daily basis.
This are two very contradicting statements 😉
Yes... One was sarcasm.
and very few prosecutions:
https://www.courthousenews.com/portland-da-wont-pursue-charges-against-most-protesters/
They don’t even need a court to show fraud just turn over what you have to the cops.
Gotta remember, they deputized officers later on and those charges were federal.
So... Trump lied about Law Enforcement supporting him? They didn't have his back.
@TaLoN132 Can there be voter fraud if the vote is counted while unsupervised? Can the counter have a different set of rules for different candidates? One smudge is worthy of correcting to fill the 'biden' mark and another smudge is unworth of correction and should be tossed?
Legit question, is there a reason for supervision of vote counting or is it not possible for the counter to be biased
None of that happened... Made up stories is not proof of anything.
CAN IT
I'm not saying it did, if unsupervised, can a counter commit fraud in this manner?
> So... Trump lied about Law Enforcement supporting him? They didn't have his back.
@TaLoN132 No, they can vacillate between true and false, depending on the point. It's a great way to be taken seriously and then become enraged when it turns out no one is obligated to believe what they say.
you mean three times in a row once when at least two eyeballs had to look at the ballot and twice when the machine counted it? like what happened in GA?
thats not correct
There are checks and balances built into the entire process. Signature checks are done in bipartisan groups. Adjudications are done in bipartisan groups. There are observers to makes sure that these processes are followed. I have not seen any evidence that this did not occur... Except one video where the election manager in Coffee County GA - which was heavily Trump - claimed she did the adjudications by herself. She is under investigation.