“Facing” ain’t proving where’s the evidence

Yeah, move that goal post big guy. It’s cool.

Paxton claimed he could take PA to court and prove his case too. How’s that go

Lol...well her on video tape stating so in her own words looks like pretty good evidence to me lol

Project Veritas “video tape” is worth jack. Unless you are suing them then it’s worth quite a bit as they always lie

But then again, Biden was on tape too. Nothin to see here. Lol

😂😂😂

Some people are just above the law.

What's the hold up??? Those should be exceedingly easy to investigate. Last I heard, Trump had hundreds of millions of dollars to spend on proving fraud. He couldn't be bothered to break off a short stack of cash to hire private investigators to prove that those were fraudulent votes?

I don't care what side of the political specanyone is on, but honesty and doing the right thing even when noone is looking should be a goal everyone strides for.

@LadyLuv2020🌅, you just advanced to level 1!

The problem was not lack of evidence. It was not getting a judge or jury to hear the evidence. Dont take anyone's word on it. Just watch the congressional hearings for yourself. Beginning to end. Lots of solid evidence

The judges saw plenty 😂

Name one suit that had an actual hearing.

They avoided it so they won't have to rule on it.

That’s certainly what Giuliani claimed isn’t it

Good night gentlemen.

Claimed what?

@yetiCodes what do you think widespread means. It’s means significant rendering the election meaningless. We don’t have evidence of this.

No judge would look at the evidence

There really wasn't... and there are plenty of cases that looked at actual evidence and none stood up to scrutiny...

You can watch the trial here:
https://www.ntd.com/programming-alert-live-coverage-of-voter-fraud-evidence-by-trump-campaign-at-nevada-court-hearing_535682.html

You can read the ruling here:
https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/nevada-judge-tosses-trump-campaigns-election-challenge-2203811/

So weird.

I bookmarked it and will look I to the case tomorrow. :)

@LadyLuv2020🌅, you just advanced to level 2!

When a judge says I’ve looked at your evidence and it’s speculative meritless drivel not based on any compelling legal argument so there’s not a point to continuing they are viewing your evidence. They just aren’t so easily fooled 😂

Although my favorite judge would certainly be the one the told Rudy and Jenna they shouldn’t be practicing law 🍿

Also depends on the political leanings of the judge and political pressure. But I haven't read it yet, and dont know what was claimed with in it

A wide variety of Trump appointed judges said Id like some evidence but you are giving me none

Have you honestly sat through and watched the hearings? That is what I have based my opinion thus far.

Yes they can get away with far more when not under oath when their testimony conflicts with their affidavit

And not news reels. The entire thing.

They signed affidavits this was not some Senate or house show boating and listening to themselves give speeches.

I am not here to argue anyway. I just have listened to all of the hearings in every state present evidence they had hoping for a day in court.

I would give more credit to showboating politicians. Signing affidavits doesn’t mean much. Especially when testimony doesn’t match the affidavit. But even the “experts” caught committing perjury aren’t facing changes let alone random scrubs.

https://twitter.com/politicalwilli/status/1349083364729360384?s=19

Tell me which ones didn't match and post the affidavit.

I dont have Twitter but I will look into that one tomorrow too

Good night. :(