Damn lower case bible upper case America. Poor baby Jesus

You just have million more instances to go to get to wide spread fraud that can change the results @yetiCodes

Let’s wait and see if they have anything stronger than “project Veritas” claims before assigning a win 😂

Lol. Don’t be a nudge. If I had a dollar for every time it was claimed that there was 0 verifiable widespread fraud... I’d have a fortune that dwarfed Trumps 💰💰💰

Again, if you look at my statements over the month, flipping an election isn’t the issue, maintaining election integrity is. I hope this women gets her fatty 20 years in prison. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Integrity in Texas 🤦‍♂️

Dead kraken you hav no integrity

@yetiCodes you would have no money. No one has ever said there was zero election fraud in a country of 35000000 in any election year ever, that’s just a straw man the right uses

No, the claim was there is no widespread fraud.

@PatriotPlaya what is with these pictures

Let's be civil, please.

500K Patriots plus 25 idiots

I specifically worded it that way, because as you responded, there are many insignificant cases.

@yetiCodes yes wide spread is a bit more than a couple cases throughout the country

No evidence of such

What will make the media and government panic for $1000?

lol. Tell that to the lady facing 20 years 😬😬😬

“Facing” ain’t proving where’s the evidence

Yeah, move that goal post big guy. It’s cool.

Paxton claimed he could take PA to court and prove his case too. How’s that go

Lol...well her on video tape stating so in her own words looks like pretty good evidence to me lol

Project Veritas “video tape” is worth jack. Unless you are suing them then it’s worth quite a bit as they always lie

But then again, Biden was on tape too. Nothin to see here. Lol

😂😂😂

Some people are just above the law.

What's the hold up??? Those should be exceedingly easy to investigate. Last I heard, Trump had hundreds of millions of dollars to spend on proving fraud. He couldn't be bothered to break off a short stack of cash to hire private investigators to prove that those were fraudulent votes?

I don't care what side of the political specanyone is on, but honesty and doing the right thing even when noone is looking should be a goal everyone strides for.

@LadyLuv2020🌅, you just advanced to level 1!

The problem was not lack of evidence. It was not getting a judge or jury to hear the evidence. Dont take anyone's word on it. Just watch the congressional hearings for yourself. Beginning to end. Lots of solid evidence

The judges saw plenty 😂

Name one suit that had an actual hearing.

They avoided it so they won't have to rule on it.

That’s certainly what Giuliani claimed isn’t it

Good night gentlemen.

Claimed what?

@yetiCodes what do you think widespread means. It’s means significant rendering the election meaningless. We don’t have evidence of this.

No judge would look at the evidence

There really wasn't... and there are plenty of cases that looked at actual evidence and none stood up to scrutiny...

You can watch the trial here:
https://www.ntd.com/programming-alert-live-coverage-of-voter-fraud-evidence-by-trump-campaign-at-nevada-court-hearing_535682.html

You can read the ruling here:
https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/nevada-judge-tosses-trump-campaigns-election-challenge-2203811/