Message from @tomB63
Discord ID: 800119419572584479
No matter the result Pence is likely never working again in public.
Pence will be at the inauguration
More of an adult than Trump
I think he can still get support in the conservative states..
Lol @MatiLuc some have said this yes others think it would’ve been an overstep to force the hand his position was to hear the objections and let them play out. The riot stopped all that from happening
Apparently Ivanka will be there too
Have anyone heard Charlie Kirk.?? Why he deleted his tweed when he wrote he send 80. Buses of patriots to DC. Capitol
Because it didn't age well.
Ted Cruz. His mouth is close after the 6th..
Ted Cruz could say 'Look, I know as well as most of this country what Trump was up to but the fact is that a bunch of people actually believed him, despite literally every other indicator screaming otherwise. My intent was to afford them the courtesy of an official airing of grievances to indulge their perception that no one thought to look into these election issues, if for nothing more than a last ditch effort to bring them back to reality.' and I would believe him.
Qui Bono? - who benefits? - it didn't benefit Trump to undercut his final chance of having the election fraud evidence presented and entered into the offical Congressional record after SCOTUS had denied the evidence presentation - the 6th was his last chance at having his evidence heard - he would not have wanted to have it stopped. The riot did not benefit Trump's progress so it makes no sense to claim he incited it. The riot *did* benefit others though.
@tomB63 Trump knew he lost , he has no evidence. His aides said as much
Also scotus was never presented a fraud case. They were presented a legislative/state constitution technicality case
if trump wanted an insurrection
@ImNotGas, you just advanced to level 27!
he could have had one
if he told those people to march inside and start arresting them
there wouldve been tens of thousands
his *aides*? So how are his *aides* spinning the afterhours unscrutinised under-the-table ballot suitcase grab video in Georgia? To be intellectually honest and convince conservatives that they are mistaken every point of evidence that they have would have to 'logically' accounted for - kind of like what you might expect to happen in a court of law ( the right does not have a leftist hivemind that responds en masse to the MSM dog whistle of slogans like Orange man Bad) and not with emotionally based white wash techniques where everything is simplified with a big rhetoric brush that 'there is no evidence' while not logically explaining away the evidence point-by-point that Trump claims to have.
@tomB63 the suit case thing was investigated. It is a non story and has been explained a thousand times.
Some lady presenting a 2 minute video with her opinions of what she thought she saw is not evidence
Also Gulannii presented very few fraud cases in court .
Like 2 percent
The Georgia election officals debunked it? weren't they the problem allowing this to happen that it even needed their explaination? - and 60minutes? Gabe Sterling? really? the Ministry of Truth? - putting the fox in charge of the henhouse -
Trump has no control of the mechanism of propaganda - mass media MSM, a dictator cannot be censored by the same propaganda machinery that he supposedly controls - so Trump isn't an Orwellian Tyrant - so the question arises, who controls the mass media? perhaps you will find the real tyrants and dictators there - globalists, corporate communists.
Its not the point that they didn't make it to court (like 2% as you claim) - that's part of the problem - the evidence wasn't properly debated over - no logical forensic defence against the numerous claims by leftist'expert witnesses, mathematicians, computer and data experts etc - its not that there was no evidence, its that it was prevented from being offically acknowledged and logically cross examined in a court - even if the judge finally ruled against the evidence with a logical response, then Trump supportes would have felt they had their day in court
They never even attempted to bring fraud cases into court @tomB63 it’s not that they were all rejected. I’m talking about the Trump team bringing forth fraud cases in front of a court. That was like 2 percent. Two percent of all the sham hotel hearings were even brought into court because they knew it was trash. @tomB63
@tomB63 there was nothing that happened. Some lady not knowing what she is talking about is not evidence
The gbi and election investigators are independent
The star witness went in front of court . Her evidence was examined and found to be non credible.
She lied about her education
She was not IT she was a temp worker
When you present a court with “experts” and it’s revealed they committed perjury and lack the experience to testify and failed to produce any methodology that doesn’t mean evidence wasn’t presented. It means there was nothing there. You aren’t inherently owed a right to present trash in courts. You have to bring real legit complaints based on reality
I swear all the following facts are true under plenty of perjury.