@SANCTIONED just note that I believe beating cops is wrong on both sides, but a BLM supported shot 5 Dallas police officers in 2016. Over the course of the summer the justice department cited that more than 700 officers were injured. The problem is that the democrat party benefits financially from BLM and back the blue, why would you have an incentive to criticize your cash cow? What would happen if you criticized the behavior of the rioters, who vote for you in overwhelming numbers, when you're trying to win a popularity contest? Political violence is not acceptable because how will society benefit when everytime a person has an issue the whole town burns down? Will it be acceptable to burn a business down for climate change? Or your house for lower taxes? Or how about blowing up abortion clinics? It is a slippery slope started because antifa and BLM got away with it. And democrats got paid to have their town burns down. Republicans however, only get donations for upholding law and order, so they have every incentive to not only throw the rioters under the bus, but also every single non violent person. The incentives for politics is not the same for society all the time. All of us can see that when they banned tampons as a nonessential item during lockdowns in Wales.

Nowhere in this did i read that you condemn what happened on the 6th. instead you've gone back to 2016. you don't have to give me a history lesson on violence. what happened in the capitol building was a act of terrorism. People chanting "hang mike pence"...move along with the bs comparisons...equally, Trump benefits from right wing extremists...and clearly, terrorists who attacked the Capitol.

Read the article and when it was written. Inside sources do not disclose identities otherwise they wouldn't remain sources. i read this article when it was published...i believe it to be true because the unnamed source, pointed out Trump was heading to the Border...guess what he is now, so i would give the source some credibility but don't believe everything as gospel. Sorry for the short responses, haven't got my self situated.

How does trump benefit? They want to impeach him. Is that something that benefits him politically? I don't know of a single president bragging about that

@Skoochie, you just advanced to level 4!

And read the first line, I am condemning both sides, the summer of violence and the 6th

he wanted to overturn the election.

I just assume I don't have to spell it out that I disagree with the 6th when the whole post is about condemning political violence

And so did Hilary.

Well, you kinda do when you respond to a post related to the violence on the 6th...

I think it's bad judgement to assume just because someone is trying to show a different perspective on why everyone is running to call this terrorism is because it's politically favorable. That if there was logical consistency they would also condemn the riots by BLM. I don't assume you condone the killing of cops because you didn't explicitly stated it. I assumed it because you condemned their beating.

if you think i'm a fan of Hilary, you barking up the wrong tree.

maybe should read the complete chat...

I'm just pointing out it's not the first time people have said they won, when they may have not won. Look at Stacy Abrams.

My perspective is that the world doesn't revolve around Trump, there are other precedent of political violence that was ignored.

So it was a completely separate point...which was about hypocrisy.

And not drawing a comparison to insurrection targeted toward the Vice President and congress in session.

Guess we get to open up again

They could make those dual purpose as cigar cutters...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ppt8m4ISoI4

Sup!

Hello from austria.does someone know, if potus will have a chance to argue in a impeachment trial?

There really isn’t enough time left for one

Talking about the senators now... Absolutely I will not vote for Ron Johnson from WI. I told him that in an e-mail but he didn't have the intestinal fortitude to speak after the riots so ya... he doesn't have a response for me either.

@Maw Hey Maw, I'll throw up a superchat but this is too long, wondering if you could clip this for discussion on the LS.

@Maw Incitement Question for Livestream

@FaithJoy

got it thanks

@FaithJoy Hi Faith! I'll throw up a superchat but this is too long, wondering if you could clip this for discussion on the LS.

@FaithJoy

Really long question though.

@Turd Ferguson that question may be too long for this show since Rob has to make that meeting, but I will pass it along to him

Yeah, it does require a setup. Social Media can make legal analysis and questions difficult. Not as bad as IP law though. Set up for analyzing infringement claims is ridiculous.

@FaithJoy Thanks! Much appreciated!

no problem!

Remember folks, I'm just a humble mod, I don't handle the donations or messages, I do it when it's only absolutely necessary! :V And even then, just the messages.

I don’t know how he can say your name with a straight face every time. Hahaha.

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy Good show to come back to on Monday! A bit of short-notice, but it's better that it happened on a Monday! Have a good night you too, and good luck with the meeting!

thank you @Maw !

Hey. Anyone in the phoenix area looking to share physical resources and ideas?