I could however be wrong.

Yeppers... it sure is...

Not sure what this means.

LOL... sorry. I am just agreeing with you "Yeppers" is just my "Yes" or "Yep"

https://youtu.be/UUe8oMh9Tws

I meant the surety of it being covered while I was being unsure of if it would be covered today.

No eViDeNcE oF vOtEr FrAuD

Yep, as much as you may not like it, many people have this opinion.

The assertion that no evidence exists is a lie.

That's like, your opinion, man.

Assertions and opinions are two very different things. At least in the digital world 😊

Well.... it is "sort of" a lie. Because there is likely some level of voter fraud in every election. And I don't know anyone that has asserted there is NO Fraud at all.

Most people are of the opinion there was no voter fraud of any real consequence. There is certainly no reliable evidence to suggest that fraud existed to such an extent to change the results even in a single county, much less a state.

Saying there is a lack of evidence != there was no fraud.

"Evidence of absence is not absence of evidence."

The quote is in reverse, but still valid.

There is an abundance of evidence

For your standards, maybe.

We have very different standards of what constitutes evidence.

I think you know that is NOT what I said.

I said there is no reliable evidence to suggest that there was any significant voter fraud.

I think we really must start at a point of thinking the election is legal and fair.

After all, voter fraud is a crime. A crime requires evidence. We do not presume someone is guilty. We presume they are innocent until evidence indicates otherwise.

The guy hacked into the machines in front of the GA legislature during the hearing after the ceo said they werent connected to the internet

This is strong correlation, weak correlation, implied causation, explicit causation, misinformation, and truths.

We don't even disagree on the point, dunno why this is being contended between you and I anyway.

I must have missed that part. Do you have a link? I watched most of the GA hearing and I didnt see that....

BUT....

Just because some COULD have happened doesn't mean it DID happen.

Sure he did. There was no evidence this statement was true.

But apparently you think this is evidence?

It's like, textbook hearsay.

When we have reasonable suspicion based on facts and circumstances, we usually investigate. Thats how evidence is obtained. What happened here is deny deny deny, mock, deny, slander, dismiss.

Cause Im a prick.... I dunno.... No, honestly I thought you were suggesting that just because there is no evidence doesnt mean it didnt happen. And sure that is true. But it wasn't what I was saying.

Most of the cases were dismissed on procedure not on merrit

Supreme court wouldnt even hear it

Congress wouldnt hear it

I'm saying because there is no evidence of fraud doesn't mean it hasn't happened, but I'm anything but suggesting there was wide-spread fraud. I follow Hanlon's Razor and Occam's Razor as principles.

The media wouldnt dare entertain it

This isn't really true.

It is absolutely true

Many, many cases were looked at the merits.

The texas case was dismissed on standing

The texas case wasn't even about fraud really.

Many were not even heard

Well... we have to disagree there. There have been over 60 cases. I have watched hours of hearings and read dozens of affidavits and I personally do not see even a reasonable suspicion.

And, I would truly like to see the link of the guy hacking into the system in the GA hearing. I truly didn't hear about that at all .

Trump and his team did not file 60 suits