Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 799770109962223646
I mean, I can only tell you they're conspiracy theories.
If there is no evidence, then obviously they're not credible.
Yeah he doesn't present evidence just says look into it and keep an eye on things in the next few days. Guess we'll find out.
Certainly, no military op of that size or stature would be leaked to a bunch of morons on the internet. Pretty safe to assume its all conjecture from what people are seeing happening in dc and across thr country. Certainly does not seem ordinary. Interestingly enough, 3 events out of a 6 step plan have occured in the last few days, so im not entirely sold Q is a crackpot. Just dont trust anything you see or hear. Question everything. Executive orders have been signed regarding ccp money and military inteligence in our media (another thing Q called, btw) ... i dont fuckin know whats goinf on but its all a lil too creepy.
@Joe Snow, you just advanced to level 10!
@boudica I'm a trump supporter, Q is complete and utter bullshit. all its done is led people to be complacent and keep 'trusting the plan' while we continually get fucked by the gop
I am holding out hope. But sure does stretch my patience. Of course we are in the want it now generation
I agree with that because they keep saying something is going to happen and then nothing does. Then they say its okay something else will happen. It would be nice to see results.
its been 4 years of '2 more weeks'
hahaha i new there was fake news going around making up stories about what people are saying and doing cnn abc nbc msnbc new york post fake news very fake news we got 75 people fact checking there lies all over the internet they really dont even know whatr a fact check looks like and we the real people and patriots are going to take them down and give the american public the real facts of the real information thats about to hit them like a ton of bricks patriots are feed up with the lies
It also does nothing but give the left fuel to think Trump supporters are nuts.
Literally you could make the argument that Nancy Pelosi is literally Q.
And it'd make more logical sense.
it honestly would since its only served the establishment
As Former LEO I can agree. I understand the movement because bad officers make every officer look bad. But I cannot and will not advocate for or support a movement that uses violence to spread its message. (Using violence and fear to spread a political message is the actual definition of terrorism)
Well, domestic terrorism anyway.
Per https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Terrorism
> The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property in order to coerce or intimidate a government or the civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives.
```(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States; and
``` See: (C)
Well... Fair enough... I was generalizing it, since the BLM movement actually affected some global companies/organizations. Including things like Federation Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) which is the governing body for a lot of global motorsports. And the International Olympic Committee (IOC).
The definition of domestic terrorism is much more narrow that terrorism as a whole.
Might not want to water down that definition too much.
@Maw Here is why the 2nd Amendment only provides Constitutional level rights to gun ownership/possession as part of the need for a well regulated militia
Its not long
I'll check it out in a bit.
But I'm sure I'm going to vehemently disagree.
As it literally says in the constitution that it's necessary for a free state, not free federal government. (Whatever that would even mean)
(As it's to protect states from the federal)
I am going to vehemently disagree.. The 2nd Amendment provides protections to the tools an Individual needs to defend themselves. The founding fathers sought a way to ensure that the Inherent right of self defense was enshrined in the Constitution as well as whatever tools a person uses to achieve self-preservation...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4zE0K22zH8
Only partially correct. The idea was that the militia was the citizenry.
Remember, this choice of word was very different 250 years ago.
It was used informally.
The people were considered an unorganized militia.
I'd argue that the word militia only meant Men older than 16 at that time. But they were far different times than now. As well... But I would absolutely agree with your statement that its the right of the people to keep and bear arms. and that includes all citizens
```(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.```
Was the same sort of deal for conscription.
Given Court decisions like Warren V. DC I honestly can't believe anyone would think that Gun Control is a good thing
In fact there is a great case to cause a lot of people to get pissed off at the courts...
Remember, the national guard wasn't a thing for a long while.
Was literally citizen militias fighting the British.