Twitter's CEO is that Jihadist warlord looking dude, right?

with the insane beard

and nose ring

Probably a Jew.

LMAO funny one

Probably a creep.

This stamens is retarded, I do t even know how to start. Nation one wants fish, nation 2 wants fur. Each nation gets what it wants and expands its wealth. It simple economics. Nations trade, get they want. So this gives your the question, do I value my “protection”. At the cost of not expanding my wealth. I have some problem with the protecting part

<:What2:777241822930010132>

ikr

''Cause they stormed the capitol, we must make dc a state''
What the actual fuck

What??

Twitter’s CEO gives me the weird vibes

Definitely not the good ones

When I call you out your will say your joking. This thing is implying that Jews are bad since your putting it with other negative things. I find this worrying. Anti Semitic joke should be making fun of the people that believe in nazi bullshit.

Dems pushing for anti domestic terrorist law

And make DC a state cause why not lmao

And create a comission to solve why this summer respond to ''protest'' was more violent

Cause you know shooting with real bullet is less violent than tear gas

Like white van and candy vibes?

Yeah.

It's retarded because your "simple" economics does not take into consideration a wide variety of special interests that might creep in during an economic deal between nations given their sociopolitical backgrounds as well as the policies they implement with their trade economics and workers. Making deals with England is not the same as making deals with Iran, and that's the issue. America First protectionism is about prioritizing what the American people as a working economy can provide for *her country* before they can even provide for others. Your comment again, misunderstands protectionism because you have really retarded assumptions of how it works and the role a government plays to her people and nation over other governed nations.

“It’s just a joke, I’m actually not anti Semitic”

?

So dumb. They used tear gas and everything. Do they even have the votes to make DC and Puerto Rico states?

Are you feeling more hopeful? You were pretty depressed on Tuesday night

Oh my God dude, how retarded and unhinged are you? How is making a probabilistic statement on inferring someone's ethnicity racist? Lol.
How *you* interpret my statements is *your* problem, not mine. If it sounded racist to you, go to your mom or room and get a safe space time then come back and move on.

thats just stupid they just pushing for more power
Like pushing for anti terrorist law xd

1. The US economy is not independent so we need agreement
2. Protectionism contradicts the US domestic policy as laid out in the middle east and the Brettonwoods Agreement
3. Protectionism is inherently anti-free market and anti competitive
4. Detroit was a fine example of failure to innovate and business dying and replaced by better ones with better goods
5. Most countries are far too small to have anything be specialized economies
6. Specizalation of labor
7. Minerals only form in certain places take the lithium triangle and China's ability to extract the 105 rare earth elements to make a smart phone
8. Cooperation yields more wealth overall than borders

America First! Not China First, not Russia First, America First! <:AmericanFlag:720120797837918288>

Texas first! <:lonestar:733843892583006241>

So you don’t care if you sound anti Semitic 😐

Don’t worry, the Twitter CEO isn’t a Jew

😁

If your domestic business cant compete than they deserve to go out. Thats antethitical to a free market

A free market should be live Darwinism, survival of the fittest

Evolution worked for animal, so why do t we try something like that with business

I personally don’t care about “free” markets

1. The US economy's independence isn't the issue. The issue here is who must benefit this growth foremost. Protectionism decrees that it should be the American, by Americans for Americans. What an American worker and business provides has no priorities to China or England, only to their people.
2. Who gives a flying fuck about that shitty agreement? Lol. Protectionism has been in America since its founding. Shut up about foreign agreements that happened post WWII.
3. No it's not, lol.
4. By the people in America, not by Chinese businesses.
5. Citation please. Also who cares? America's size is irrelevant. What matters is the resources America has and how they are harnessed by their people and for their benefit.
6. And? This isn't a problem for protectionist economic policies. You are talking right out of your ass.
7. Yo who cares about a specific resource being exclusive to one country? This isn't remotely relevant how American economy should prioritize its workers and businesses first over China's sweat factories, lol.
8. If said cooperation yields conflicts of interest, they will hurt the American worker.

No, I don't care how some snowflake thinks I sound like.

I care about markets and work and exist.

I only care about the workers, thank you very much

The workers should get what they deserve

Okay, well, have a nice time looking like an ass, not my problem