Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 671769256131690574
Not what I meant
Are u familiar with Joseph Smith?
Mormon
How about his connection to the *Book Of Abraham?*
Was he alive in 70AD?
?
Joseph Smith??
😆
lol
@Queen Of Conspiracy
Joseph Smith is relevant becuz Joseph Smith invented the claims that some *Egyptian* writings *(which are dated later than Abraham's time, & were not identified as being written by Abraham mind u)* are the *Book of Abraham;* it's a hypothesis that was never accepted outside the Mormon church *(& a few small spheres of occult influencers),* & it's been historically-linguistically debunked
I've researched into the etymological analysis of those writings myself
*(I'm well adversed in history & language)*
What? I just told u what he has to do with it
He invented the notion
*(about the identity if the book)*
He's mis-identifying the writings
Mischaracterizing the writings per his Mormon revisions
Its documented
The Mormons purchased those writings
How are u not following this?
Joseph Smith misidentified the writings as biblical
It's simple
@Deleted User I just can't talk becuz I'm in Starbucks
I don't wanna' discuss this aloud
Oh ok
Looking into the mic situation I think I might have moved you
No, it's not irrelevant...
1) The writings don't match Abraham's time
2) The writings weren't confirmed as being a part of the biblical body of works
3) The Mormons created the notion that some *Egyptian* writings which were found were a biblical writings *(however that's untrue)*
I need more coffee
The Apocalypse of Abraham is a pseudepigraphic work (a text whose claimed authorship is uncertain) based on the Old Testament. Probably composed between about 70-150 AD from earlier writings and tradition possibly kept from the time of Abraham , it is of Jewish origin and is usually considered to be part of the Apocalyptic literature .
Those works aren't officially recognized as being akin to the biblical narrative, but rather, revisionists have stitched the misconception to the Bible's reputation
Like the Talmud
Or Qur'an
Or Nag Hamadi
Etc...
Book of Enoch is legit though
BTW, councils invented the fallacious categorizations which confuses most people regarding official vs unauthenticated alleged biblical writings
For 1, the becuz the Book of Enoch is verified biblically
The others aren't
Enoch & the Book Of, are referenced in the Bible