?

Joseph Smith??

😆

lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9U-f-vtXkQ

@Queen Of Conspiracy
Joseph Smith is relevant becuz Joseph Smith invented the claims that some *Egyptian* writings *(which are dated later than Abraham's time, & were not identified as being written by Abraham mind u)* are the *Book of Abraham;* it's a hypothesis that was never accepted outside the Mormon church *(& a few small spheres of occult influencers),* & it's been historically-linguistically debunked

I've researched into the etymological analysis of those writings myself

*(I'm well adversed in history & language)*

What? I just told u what he has to do with it

He invented the notion

*(about the identity if the book)*

He's mis-identifying the writings

Mischaracterizing the writings per his Mormon revisions

Its documented

The Mormons purchased those writings

& popularized the *theory*

How are u not following this?

Joseph Smith misidentified the writings as biblical

It's simple

@Deleted User I just can't talk becuz I'm in Starbucks

I don't wanna' discuss this aloud

Oh ok

Looking into the mic situation I think I might have moved you

No, it's not irrelevant...
1) The writings don't match Abraham's time
2) The writings weren't confirmed as being a part of the biblical body of works
3) The Mormons created the notion that some *Egyptian* writings which were found were a biblical writings *(however that's untrue)*

I need more coffee

The Apocalypse of Abraham is a pseudepigraphic work (a text whose claimed authorship is uncertain) based on the Old Testament. Probably composed between about 70-150 AD from earlier writings and tradition possibly kept from the time of Abraham , it is of Jewish origin and is usually considered to be part of the Apocalyptic literature .

Those works aren't officially recognized as being akin to the biblical narrative, but rather, revisionists have stitched the misconception to the Bible's reputation

Like the Talmud

Or Qur'an

Or Nag Hamadi

Etc...

Book of Enoch is legit though

BTW, councils invented the fallacious categorizations which confuses most people regarding official vs unauthenticated alleged biblical writings

For 1, the becuz the Book of Enoch is verified biblically

The others aren't

Enoch & the Book Of, are referenced in the Bible

👌

How are u implicating Ethiopians?

They had copies

It means nothing

The Vatican has copies