If I were arguing this case that's what I would argue

Hi

Hi!

And when people complain about disenfranchisement, they can complain to the demoncrats who tried to pull this ridiculous stunt

Hiya foxy!

I just think the safer reasoning the SCOTUS would be that that couldn't be observed, which by law makes them illegal.

You guys wanna hear a joke about our pedo-elect jo Biden

The other thing is more sketchy because some of them could indeed be legal, and you'd be throwing away good votes too.

Yeah sure.

way to go @Skittles, you just advanced to level 17 <:magahat:772838503239122984>

What to Biden and acne have in common

That both post the election.

They

That too

Lol

It would cause people to be upset but it's not sketchy...

My sloppy spelling there.

Lmao

The argument is a solid one and not easy to refute... I used to work for a civil litigation attorney and was going to be a lawyer before I changed career paths

How do you work now?

@JunoBlade

Foxy, jokes like that are not appropriate for this sever. please keep 'em clean. Thanks!

@Skittles You mean what do I do for work??

Yeah

I am a graphic designer

Well that's partly what I mean, it's more of a chance that good valid votes were thrown out. I'd rather do it for the reason that makes them legally unlawfull, lol.

Nice. I was thinking about being a judge but I don’t know how good my safety would be.

I would imagine that both arguments, plus some, will likely be used. The president has a very strong case in this

If I were the attorney handling this case I would use every argument I could... but I think the two above are a couple of the strongest ones

If they can also prove the stuff about Dominion then not only will we get our president back but it will likely trigger a complete overhaul of our system

We need that

Daddy Trump will take the W!

Can’t stand this fella

Daddy Trump, lol

lol

I noticed that Scytl was not mentioned in last night's lawsuit.

Yeah... Biden would be a disaster for this country

of course, the above proposals by Biden would be challenged in the courts..

It's odd though... firearms are already required to be registered. All of our are. What these anti-gun lunatics don't understand is that criminal who get theirs illegally will STILL do so and they will not be registered no matter how many laws he tries to put in place

Democrats don't seem to get that criminals don't give a flying fig what laws you make.

Exactly