Message from @DariusGalaxyz

Discord ID: 781550460468985877


2020-11-26 15:53:12 UTC  

I am just administrator. Sorry

2020-11-26 15:53:25 UTC  

GamersForTrump is our founder and the owner and lead administrator

2020-11-26 15:53:26 UTC  

Don't apologize, lol.

2020-11-26 15:53:36 UTC  

I was just wondering why Bryson Gray was in your name, lol.

2020-11-26 15:53:46 UTC  

Glad to have you! Did you get registered.

2020-11-26 15:53:59 UTC  

But some of those ballots in the mix would be correctly dated.

2020-11-26 15:54:05 UTC  

Happy ThanksWINNING @Skittles !!! Good Morning!!!

2020-11-26 15:54:58 UTC  

I don't know if they would do that, they could only invalidate the ones that were properly segregated, which is like 10,000. But they CAN invalidate basically ALL of the mail-in ballots on the grounds that they were ALL unlawfull on the grounds that they weren't legally "observed".

2020-11-26 15:54:58 UTC  

way to go @DariusGalaxyz, you just advanced to level 3 <:magahat:772838503239122984>

2020-11-26 15:55:13 UTC  

The language in some of these states for not being observed even says the word unlawfull

2020-11-26 15:58:39 UTC  

Thank you happy Thanksgiving to you too @GamersForTrump

2020-11-26 15:59:25 UTC  

Me ?

2020-11-26 15:59:39 UTC  

They can invalidate ALL of them on the grounds that because there is no way now to tell which were possibly fraudulent and which were not

2020-11-26 16:00:14 UTC  

Once they are separated from their envelopes chain of custody is lost...

2020-11-26 16:00:44 UTC  

and because there is no way to tell which are which at that point, they could conceivable invalidate all of them

2020-11-26 16:00:54 UTC  

If I were arguing this case that's what I would argue

2020-11-26 16:01:45 UTC  

Hi

2020-11-26 16:01:50 UTC  

Hi!

2020-11-26 16:02:11 UTC  

And when people complain about disenfranchisement, they can complain to the demoncrats who tried to pull this ridiculous stunt

2020-11-26 16:02:19 UTC  

Hiya foxy!

2020-11-26 16:02:30 UTC  

I just think the safer reasoning the SCOTUS would be that that couldn't be observed, which by law makes them illegal.

2020-11-26 16:02:33 UTC  

You guys wanna hear a joke about our pedo-elect jo Biden

2020-11-26 16:02:49 UTC  

The other thing is more sketchy because some of them could indeed be legal, and you'd be throwing away good votes too.

2020-11-26 16:02:53 UTC  

Yeah sure.

2020-11-26 16:02:53 UTC  

way to go @Skittles, you just advanced to level 17 <:magahat:772838503239122984>

2020-11-26 16:03:11 UTC  

What to Biden and acne have in common

2020-11-26 16:03:38 UTC  

That both post the election.

2020-11-26 16:03:41 UTC  

They

2020-11-26 16:03:45 UTC  

That too

2020-11-26 16:03:48 UTC  

Lol

2020-11-26 16:03:51 UTC  

It would cause people to be upset but it's not sketchy...

2020-11-26 16:04:23 UTC  

My sloppy spelling there.

2020-11-26 16:04:30 UTC  

Lmao

2020-11-26 16:04:32 UTC  

The argument is a solid one and not easy to refute... I used to work for a civil litigation attorney and was going to be a lawyer before I changed career paths

2020-11-26 16:05:00 UTC  

How do you work now?

2020-11-26 16:05:04 UTC  
2020-11-26 16:05:29 UTC  

Foxy, jokes like that are not appropriate for this sever. please keep 'em clean. Thanks!

2020-11-26 16:05:48 UTC  

@Skittles You mean what do I do for work??

2020-11-26 16:05:56 UTC  

Yeah

2020-11-26 16:05:58 UTC  

I am a graphic designer

2020-11-26 16:06:25 UTC  

Well that's partly what I mean, it's more of a chance that good valid votes were thrown out. I'd rather do it for the reason that makes them legally unlawfull, lol.